Abstract
The region as a concept continues to hold promise as a way of breaking through the many binaries that often divide political ecology. Operationalizing a regional political ecology approach allows the researcher to generate a large number of insights and conclusions that a more narrow disciplinary (disciplined) focus and non-scalar approach would miss; this is because important biophysical and social processes intersect with each another and work together to produce and/or mediate important outcomes for human and environmental well-being. The article draws on a number of cases to examine what comparison of political ecological research between regions could look like. I argue for a reinvigorated relationship between regional political ecology as an approach and agrifood systems as the object of study, and pose questions that can help shape this endeavor.Keywords: regional political ecology, regional comparisons, network political ecology, agriculture, food systems, agroecology
Highlights
Regional political ecology grew out of efforts to understand largely peasant societies and the ways in which capital and the state created political economic structures for surplus extraction that were incompatible with long-term conservation and sustainability (Blaikie 1985; Blaikie and Brookfield 1987)
In comparing the photos of the region to my birth region of the San Joaquin Valley of California, a Mediterranean-climate region largely dedicated to agriculture but one with an incredibly different landscape, I saw that regions matter because, on the one hand, biophysical environments provide dramatically different conditions for the possibilities of human habitation and use of the land, and, on the other, human modifications iteratively shape these possibilities
A regional political ecology approach expressed through my fieldwork allowed me to generate a large number of insights and conclusions that a more narrow disciplinary focus and non-scalar approach would have missed, since the all-too-common blinders of narrow disciplines would not have allowed to me to look at the ways that important biophysical and social processes intersected with each another and worked together to produce and/or mediate important outcomes for human and environmental well-being within the region (Galt 2014)
Summary
Regional political ecology grew out of efforts to understand largely peasant societies and the ways in which capital and the state created political economic structures for surplus extraction that were incompatible with long-term conservation and sustainability (Blaikie 1985; Blaikie and Brookfield 1987). Despite the various binaries that have structured political ecological imaginaries since I agree with Walker (2003) and McKinnon and Hiner (2016) that the region endures as a way of productively working through the false binaries. This article serves to set regional political ecology within my own experience and explore the ways it has been useful and can be made even more useful through a networked political ecology approach
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.