The Relevance of Coronary Sinus Interventions in Cardiac Surgery

Abstract

The concept of arterialization of the coronary venous system was first discussed almost 100 years ago. Subsequently, those attracted by this approach have chosen the coronary veins as an alternative route for interventional and surgical therapy. Modern techniques of coronary sinus interventions (CSI) have been suggested mainly for temporary support and protection of ischemic myocardium. Based on the dense meshwork structure of the venous vasculature, CSI may be effective even in the presence of serious coronary artery disease. Three major techniques have been suggested for different indications in cardiology and cardiac surgery: 1) ECG-synchronized retroperfusion of arterial blood, which is supposed to positively affect ischemic myocardium by phasic supply of oxygen to deprived areas mainly in cardiac emergencies, 2) retroinfusion of cardioplegia in the arrested heart, which is now a well-established clinical technique, and 3) intermittent coronary sinus occlusion during antegrade cardioplegic delivery in the arrested heart and in the early reperfusion period after surgical revascularization, or in cardiac emergencies. The beneficial effect of pressure-controlled intermittent coronary sinus occlusion is assumed to result from cyclic occlusion and release of the coronary sinus shifting venous blood to underperfused regions, thereby facilitating substrate delivery and subsequent washout of metabolites. Experimental studies and first clinical trials suggest that all methods of CSI are safe and feasible, and the ultimate goals of reduction of infarct size and preservation of jeopardized ischemic myocardium will be achieved.