Abstract
Since its heyday in the 1960s–1980s, the relevance logic programme has lost much of its momentum. The underlying idea has indeed been transposed into various kinds of formal system, but they lack the intuitive transparency that was once hoped for. Today, relevance logic is not part of the mainstream of the broader discipline of logic, nor has it been widely taken up by computer scientists, mathematicians or philosophers. Has the programme failed, or has it merely stalled? We suggest the latter, proposing a natural way of generating a relevance logic by means of suitably controlled semantic decomposition trees.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
