Abstract
Purpose of the article, 130. — I. Dunlop's analysis of English data, 130. — Criticisms: movements of real wage rates in periods of rising money wages not very different from those in other periods, 132; rise in real wage rates due in some instances to a fall in the cost of living, 132. — Tarshis' analysis of data for the United States, 135. — His use of coefficient of association open to question, 135. — Other objections, 135. — Richardson's analysis of the English data involves analogous difficulties, 136. — II. Re-analysis of the English data, 137; of the American data, 143. — III. The concept of real wage rates used in these studies is of doubtful validity, 146. — Money wages and welfare, 148. — Conclusions, 149.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
