Abstract

Plants involved in specialized pollinator interactions, such as nursery pollination, may experience trade-offs in their female fitness, as the larvae of their pollinators may also consume seeds produced by the flowers they pollinate. These interactions could potentially shift between mutualism and parasitism, depending on the presence and abundance of both the nursery pollinator and of other pollinators. We investigated the fitness trade-off in a Mediterranean plant (Silene latifolia), which has a specialist nocturnal nursery pollinator moth (Hadena bicruris) and is also visited by several diurnal pollinators. We estimated the pollination rates and fecundity of S. latifolia in both natural and experimental populations in the Mediterranean. We estimated natural pollination rates in different flowering times and with presence/absence of the H. bicruis moth. Then by exposing plants to each pollinator group either during the day or at night, we quantified the contribution of other diurnal pollinators and the specialized nocturnal nursery pollinator to plant female fitness. We found no difference in plant fruit set mediated by diurnal versus nocturnal pollinators, indicating that non-specialist pollinators contribute to plant female fitness. However, in both natural and experimental populations, H. bicruris was the most efficient pollinator in terms of seeds produced per fruit. These results suggest that the female fitness costs generated by nursery pollination can be overcome through higher fertilization rates relative to predation rates, even in the presence of co-pollinators. Quantifying such interactions is important for our understanding of the selective pressures that promote highly specialized mutualisms, such as nursery pollination, in the Mediterranean region, a centre of diversification of the carnation family.

Highlights

  • The availability and abundance of effective pollinators is a key factor in determining the fitness of animalpollinated plants (Stephenson 1981; Muchhala 2003; Muchhala et al 2009)

  • We addressed the following questions: (i) Do natural populations of S. latifolia predated and non-predated by H. bicruris differ in seed set? (ii) Does the presence of H. bicruris enhance S. latifolia pollination efficiency? (iii) To what extent does S. latifolia depend on diurnal pollinators?

  • Fruit and seed set of S. latifolia varied over its flowering season (3 months) in the MSA population (Kruskal–Wallis test: fruit set χ2 = 9.224; DF = 2; P = 0.01; Kruskal–Wallis test: seed set χ2 = 50.806; DF = 2; P < 0.001)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The availability and abundance of effective pollinators is a key factor in determining the fitness of animalpollinated plants (Stephenson 1981; Muchhala 2003; Muchhala et al 2009). Scopece et al – Diurnal and nocturnal pollination in a nursery-pollinated species selection on floral traits have demonstrated more complex and sometimes contradictory results (Morse and Fritz 1983; Jennersten 1988; Thompson and Pellmyr 1992; Groman and Pellmyr 1999; Herrera 2000; Young 2002; Wolff et al 2003) This suggests that most specialized interactions are not a mere adaptation to the most effective pollinator or pollinator functional class (sensu Fenster et al 2004) but selection may favour floral traits that attract new pollinators without excluding previous ones (Waser et al 1996; Aigner 2001, 2004; Fenster et al 2004). The overall evolution of floral traits in a species can be the result of adaptation to many pollinators, even though individual populations at any moment in time would be continuously adapting to one or a few local pollinators (Dilley et al 2000)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call