Abstract
Philosophers of law typically analyse law and legal systems in isolation from one another, where the identity of legal systems is understood by distinguishing between norms that belong to different systems, and concepts of law are built by identifying features of those systems that are universal or near-universal, or truistic and seemingly important (e.g., Raz 2009a; Shapiro 2010). In contrast, what I am calling ‘pluralist jurisprudence’ examines the implications of overlapping and sometimes conflicting levels of state, supra-state, inter-state and sub-state law.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
