Abstract

IntroductionVariance in hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis reactivity is considered to be one of the sources of differences in infant temperament. The cortisol enters into interactions with dopamine and serotonin, so it is expected that polymorphisms in genes coding monoamine metabolism influence both HPA axis reactivity and temperament.MethodsWe therefore explore the relationship among 5‐HTTLPR S/L, MAOA H/L, and COMT Val158Met polymorphisms, the stress reaction of newborn infants after a heel stick blood draw (measured by determining salivary cortisol at three time points), and temperament assessed at the age of 3 months using Rothbart's Infant Behavior Questionnaire—Revised (IBQ‐R) with a sample of 84 infants.ResultsThe decrease in the salivary cortisol correlated with nine primary scales and all three secondary scales of IBQ‐R. Children with a greater cortisol decrease were assessed as less susceptible to negative emotions, more extraverted, and more regulated. The polymorphisms that were observed were related both to the course of the stress reaction and to temperament. The 5‐HTTLPR S allele was connected to higher scores for Negative Emotionality and lower scores for Orienting/Regulatory Capacity. The presence of the MAOA L allele predisposed its carriers to higher scores for Negative Emotionality, lower scores for Orienting/Regulatory Capacity, and a lower decrease in cortisol. The Met allele of COMT Val158Met polymorphism was connected to a higher Positive Affectivity/Surgency and Orienting/Regulatory Capacity and a greater cortisol decrease.ConclusionsContrary to previous studies referring mainly basal cortisol and its increase, the results of our study emphasize the importance of cortisol elimination in infant temperament. Another interesting finding was a higher cortisol increase, higher Distress to Limitations, Negative Emotionality, and Approach in MAOA LL homozygotes which are traditionally understood as more vulnerable toward early stress in developing later externalizing behavior.

Highlights

  • Variance in hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis reactivity is considered to be one of the sources of differences in infant temperament

  • Taken into account that very plastic HPA axis is molded by early experiences and mediates their influence on consequent development, we suggest that the HPA axis sensitivity plays an important role in the vulnerability of MAOA L carriers and that L allele predisposes them to a greater reactivity of HPA axis

  • Extraversion was connected to a greater cortisol decrease and to the presence of met COMT and the high-activity MAOA allele; negative emotionality was linked to a lower decrease in cortisol and to the occurrence of S 5-HTTLPR and L MAOA and regulation was associated with a greater cortisol decrease and the presence of met COMT, H MAOA, and the L 5-HTTLPR allele

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Variance in hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis reactivity is considered to be one of the sources of differences in infant temperament. The presence of the MAOA L allele predisposed its carriers to higher scores for Negative Emotionality, lower scores for Orienting/Regulatory Capacity, and a lower decrease in cortisol. The Met allele of COMT Val158Met polymorphism was connected to a higher Positive Affectivity/Surgency and Orienting/Regulatory Capacity and a greater cortisol decrease. Conclusions: Contrary to previous studies referring mainly basal cortisol and its increase, the results of our study emphasize the importance of cortisol elimination in infant temperament Another interesting finding was a higher cortisol increase, higher Distress to Limitations, Negative Emotionality, and Approach in MAOA LL homozygotes which are traditionally understood as more vulnerable toward early stress in developing later externalizing behavior. While Thomas and Chess limit it to traits that determine formal characteristics of behavior, Goldsmith and Campos understand temperament as individual differences in the probability of experiencing, expressing and regulating the primary emotions (Goldsmith et al, 1987). Subsequent factor analyses yielded three secondary factors of surgency, negative affect, and self-regulation

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call