Abstract
Objectives. The goal of the study was to determine whether the criterion‐based content analysis (CBCA) indicators of credibility were more likely to be elicited by open‐ended interview prompts than by more directive prompts.Methods. Coders independently applied a revised CBCA coding scheme while others rated interviewer utterance types and the length and richness of children's responses in transcripts of 20 forensic interviews of alleged victims of child sexual abuse.Results. There were high correlations between the number of CBCA criteria identified and both the length and richness of the children's utterances. Open‐ended invitations were especially useful in eliciting responses that contained CBCA criteria, as expected.Conclusions. Open‐ended invitations thus appear to elicit both more numerous details and details that are believed to suggest credibility. Implications for the application of CBCA codes to credibility assessment are discussed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.