The relationship of public investments in science and scientometric indicators from the perspective of Croatian universities

Abstract

Aim: This study addresses the hypothesis that the invest-ments in science are positively correlated with the indica-tors of productivity and performance of the universities. Methods: A cross-sectional design was used with the datafrom 27 EU countries. The percentage of GDP invested in science in higher education in 2019 and investments ex-pressed as €/inhabitant were used. The criterion variables were total number of publications in Web of Science for 2020; number of publications categorized as article, review or note (ARN); change in the number of publications com-pared to 2016 in total and for Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) research areas; productivity per inhabitant; productivity per researcher; productivity per researcher in higher education system; and number of Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) TOP1000 universities per inhabitant. Descriptive data and Pearson and Spearman correlations were calculat-ed. Additionally, partial Spearman correlations for detailed examinations were used.Results: Most of the productivity indicators were positivelycorrelated to the investment in science. The absolute invest-ment in science in €/inhabitant is more important than in-vestment expressed as the percentage of GDP. Unexpectedly, the correlations between investments and the growth rate in productivity were negative indicating that the less devel-oped countries have achieved a larger growth in productiv-ity in the examined 5-year period. Conclusion: The results indicate that the investments inscience as the percentage of GDP is important, but the ab-solute amount of money also has an important role in the prediction of scientific productivity. However, since the absolute amount of investments is limited in the less developed countries, they should be more focused on buildingthe strategies that capitalize on specific strengths and potentials. This further accentuates the need for science policychange in Croatia with the strategic focus on aligning the re-sources to the expected results.