Abstract

Introduction: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are the most frequently reported knee injury in athletes. For those who wish to return to play (RTP), ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is recommended to restore knee function and stability. Knowledge of important predictors of RTP post-ACLR can aid surgeons and allied health professionals to effectively manage athletes’ rehabilitation expectations. The purpose of this study was to determine which athlete factors and patient reported outcomes predict RTP at 1-year post-ACLR. Methods: This prospective cohort study recruited 336 participants who underwent ACLR at SSC in Dublin. Data collected included; baseline demographics, details of sport participation, injury mechanism, intent to RTP and patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) questionnaires at baseline (Marx, ACL-RSI) and at 1-year post-ACLR (Marx, ACL-RSI, Cincinnati, IKDC). Participants were categorised based on successful RTP 1-year post-ACLR. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to evaluate the association between RTP and athlete factors and PROMs. Results: Two hundred twenty (65.45%) participants RTP at 1-year post-ACLR. Participants were more likely to RTP if they were younger (OR:0.972, 95%CI:0.952-0.995), intended to return to a higher level of sport (OR:2.125, 95%CI:1.169-3.861), had higher baseline Marx scores (OR: 1.066, 95%CI:1.022-1.111), and higher Marx (OR:1.291, 95%CI:1.214-1.373) and IKDC scores at 1-year post-operative (OR:1.065, 95%CI:1.041-1.088). Higher Marx scores at 1-year post-operative (OR:1.291, 95%CI:1.214-1.373) were the only significant predictors of RTP. The model yielded an area under the curve of 0.81, demonstrating excellent discriminative ability. Discussion: Patients were more likely to RTP if they had better functional activity outcomes at 1-year post-ACLR, suggesting that PROMs can be used to assess how likely an athlete is to RTP. Conclusion: Further research should focus on identifying which PROMs are modifiable and can be improved during post-ACLR rehabilitation to further encourage RTP.

Highlights

  • Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are the most frequently reported knee injury in athletes

  • Participants were more likely to return to play (RTP) if they were younger (OR:0.972, 95%CI:0.952-0.995), intended to return to a higher level of sport (OR:2.125, 95%CI:1.169-3.861), had higher baseline Marx scores (OR: 1.066, 95%CI:1.022-1.111), and higher Marx (OR:1.291, 95%CI:1.214-1.373) and International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC) scores at 1-year post-operative (OR:1.065, 95%CI:1.041-1.088)

  • Patients were more likely to RTP if they had better functional activity outcomes at 1-year post-ACL reconstruction (ACLR), suggesting that patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) can be used to assess how likely an athlete is to RTP

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are the most frequently reported knee injury in athletes. For those who wish to return to play (RTP), ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is recommended to restore knee function and stability. The purpose of this study was to determine which athlete factors and patient reported outcomes predict RTP at 1-year post-ACLR. Data collected included; baseline demographics, details of sport participation, injury mechanism, intent to RTP and patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) questionnaires at baseline (Marx, ACL-RSI) and at 1-year post-ACLR (Marx, ACL-RSI, Cincinnati, IKDC). Opting-out of ACLR often results in persistent knee instability and further chondral and/or meniscal damage [5] For these reasons, surgical intervention is advised for all patients who wish to return to sport participation [2]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.