Abstract
An experiment was designed to investigate a method claimed (Ikeda & Obonai, 1955) to demonstrate a necessary relationship between visual illusions and figural aftereffects. The experiment indicated that the report of an apparently smooth transition, from illusion to aftereffect, is misleading. Rather, the method sets up competing judgments in the region between simultaneous and successive conditions of presentation; the outcome being a replacement of the illusion by the aftereffect.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
