Abstract

Soft materials that are subjected to large deformations exhibit an extremely rich phenomenology, with properties lying in between those of simple fluids and those of elastic solids. In the continuum description of these systems, one typically follows either the route of solid mechanics (Lagrangian description) or the route of fluid mechanics (Eulerian description). The purpose of this review is to highlight the relationship between the theories of viscoelasticity and of elasticity, and to leverage this connection in contemporary soft matter problems. We review the principles governing models for viscoelastic liquids, for example solutions of flexible polymers. Such materials are characterized by a relaxation time λ, over which stresses relax. We recall the kinematics and elastic response of large deformations, and show which polymer models do (and which do not) correspond to a nonlinear elastic solid in the limit λ → ∞. With this insight, we split the work done by elastic stresses into reversible and dissipative parts, and establish the general form of the conservation law for the total energy. The elastic correspondence can offer an insightful tool for a broad class of problems; as an illustration, we show how the presence or absence of an elastic limit determines the fate of an elastic thread during capillary instability.

Highlights

  • The aim of this review is to expose systematically the relationship between the theories of viscoelasticity and of elasticity, and to leverage what can be learned from this connection

  • This relationship is much more difficult to find in the literature, but it can greatly contribute to the understanding of contemporary developments involving soft materials at large deformations

  • This review focuses on the specific issue of how the theories of elasticity and of viscoelasticity are related, and to leverage what can be learned from this connection in the context of recent research

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The aim of this review is to expose systematically the relationship between the theories of viscoelasticity and of elasticity, and to leverage what can be learned from this connection. We are in a position to give a kinematic interpretation to the relaxation equation λA = f (A), making use of the elastic limit λ → ∞ In this limit, we have seen that the upper convected derivative implies that the conformation tensor A (stretching of the polymer) evolves in the exact same way as the Finger tensor B (stretching by the flow F). There, the upper convected derivative appears when the vector describing the orientation and length of the spring is transported in the same way as any vector moving along with the fluid [3] The Johnson–Segalman model was never intended to describe elastic solids, but rather to capture non-monotonic stress relaxation

Collapse of a cylinder under surface tension
Energy and dissipation
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call