Abstract

By considering the theory of basic values, several studies have considered the different underlying value patterns of social dominance orientation (SDO) and right-wing authoritarianism (RWA). Recently, the value theory has been developed into a finer set of conceptually distinct values. Specifically, the same key assumptions have been retained, but 19 instead of 10 motivationally distinct values have been distinguished. The aim of the present research is to analyze the relationship between ideological and value orientations, using the refined theory of basic values. In line with previous studies, it was hypothesized that SDO would be mainly placed on the self-enhancement vs. self-transcendence value opposition, while RWA on that of the conservation vs. openness to change. Results on two hundred participants confirm the hypotheses. In particular, dominant people are characterized by a sense of superiority, supremacy, and unfairness, while authoritarian people by the perception of social instability and passive conformism with rules and laws. Moreover, by considering the underlying dimensions of both RWA and SDO, our results provide evidence of some differences existing in their mirror on specific value priorities.

Highlights

  • By considering the theory of basic values, several studies have considered the different underlying value patterns of social dominance orientation (SDO) and right-wing authoritarianism (RWA)

  • In view of the differences between the authoritarian attitudinal clusters, it was expected that RWAsub would be positively related to conservation values and negatively to openness to change values, as it identifies passive compliance with established authorities; RWAagg to security values and negatively to universalism-tolerance, as it detects feelings of aggression towards those who are perceived as deviants and as a threat to the social order; and RWAcon to tradition, as it discerns a strict adherence to conventional values and norms

  • The current study confirms research (e.g. Feather & McKee, 2012; Sinn, 2019) that has shown that SDO and RWA are characterized by a different mirror on value orientations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

By considering the theory of basic values, several studies have considered the different underlying value patterns of social dominance orientation (SDO) and right-wing authoritarianism (RWA). There are small differences in the various studies, in general when statistically corrected for RWA, SDO is more characterized on the self-enhancement vs self-transcendence opposition: i.e., it is positively related with values of power and achievement, and negatively with universalism and benevolence.

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call