Abstract

BackgroundIn patients with breast cancer, increasing tumour size at diagnosis is associated with an increased likelihood of axillary lymph node involvement and increased breast cancer-specific mortality. However, this relation is based on studies which combine all tumours smaller than 1.0 cm in a single category and all tumours larger than 5.0 cm in another category. This coarse classification may obscure a nuanced description of the effects of tumour size across the full range of possible sizes.MethodsWe examined the relationship between primary tumour size, lymph node status and distant metastases in a cohort of 819,647 women diagnosed with first primary invasive breast cancer from 1990 to 2014 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registries database. All patients in the cohort had a known primary tumour size between 1 and 150 mm in greatest dimension. Primary tumour size was examined as a continuous (1–150 mm) and categorical variable (15 size groups; 10-mm intervals). For each 1- or 10-mm size group, we determined the proportion of patients with positive lymph nodes at diagnosis, the proportion of patients with distant metastases at diagnosis and the actuarial cumulative risk of breast cancer-specific mortality at 15 years from diagnosis.ResultsAmong 819,647 patients with invasive breast tumours between 1 and 150 mm in size, there was a non-linear correlation between increasing tumour size and the prevalence of lymph node metastases at diagnosis (% node-positive), the prevalence of distant metastases at diagnosis (% stage IV) and the 15-year rate of breast cancer-specific mortality across the entire size spectrum. For very small tumours (under 10 mm) and for very large tumours (larger than 60–90 mm) there was little correlation between tumour size and metastasis risk.ConclusionsThe relationship between tumour size, lymph node status and distant metastases in patients with invasive breast cancer is not linear. This calls into question the conventional model that the capacity for a primary breast tumour to metastasize increases as the tumour enlarges.

Highlights

  • Breast cancer is thought to progress in a stepwise manner through several stages: hyperplasia—intraductal carcinoma—invasion and growth within the breast, followed by metastasis to the lymph nodes and/or distant sites [1, 2]

  • Patients are not followed forward in time to record the transition from a non-metastatic state to a metastatic state; the cross-sectional correlation between tumour size and metastasis is a graphical representation of a sample of different patients at the point of diagnosis

  • We identified 819,647 women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer in the USA between 1990 and 2014

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Breast cancer is thought to progress in a stepwise manner through several stages: hyperplasia—intraductal carcinoma—invasion and growth within the breast, followed (in some cases) by metastasis to the lymph nodes and/or distant sites [1, 2]. In patients with breast cancer, increasing tumour size at diagnosis is associated with an increased likelihood of axillary lymph node involvement and increased breast cancer-specific mortality This relation is based on studies which combine all tumours smaller than 1.0 cm in a single category and all tumours larger than 5.0 cm in another category. Conclusions The relationship between tumour size, lymph node status and distant metastases in patients with invasive breast cancer is not linear This calls into question the conventional model that the capacity for a primary breast tumour to metastasize increases as the tumour enlarges

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call