Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has imposed hefty tolls upon humanity. Aside from tremendous fatalities and indelible damage inflicted upon the bodies of many recovered afflicted, lockdown and quarantine orders that it instigated have been shown by previous studies to have a psychological impact on humans. Ostensibly, gregarious animals like humans would lose the sense of belonging to society when occluded from the outside world, which is the case of lockdown and quarantine, and the loss thereof would precipitate negative mentalities. Measuring the former can be executed through the social connectedness scale, whereas one of the ways to gauge the latter is through the perceived stress scale. By conventional notion, perceived stress would have an inverted relationship with social connectedness, as suggested by previous studies. However, a long time has passed since they were conducted and sundry technologies have come to life ever since. People today, especially younger ones, are inclined to use these technologies for entertainment, and past research unveiled their efficacy in alleviating stress. This study was, therefore, commenced on the premise that low social connectedness during COVID-19 lockdown does not necessarily entail high stress among high school students in Thai schools in the Pathumwan district of Bangkok, who were of young ages and whose average household income exceeds that of many of their geographical counterparts. According to responses from the participants (n=374), there is no correlation between social connectedness and perceived stress, which supported the premise. While a conclusion can be drawn that technology use helps reduce the stress that would otherwise rise amidst the lockdown and would be responsible for the noncorrelation, more research is required to identify the clear cause of this astonishing outcome.

Highlights

  • Humans are a gregarious species; we rely on our conspecifics for our health and welfare (Snyder-Mackler et al, 2020)

  • The social connectedness scale has been devised to gauge our sense of belonging to a social relationship or network purported to be a critical facet of our species, and unsurprisingly, various experiments have reported higher levels of social connectedness among those engaging in more social interactions (Margolis & Lyubomirsky, 2020)

  • The results indicated that social connectedness and perceived stress are not correlated during persistent COVID-19 lockdown, conflicting with findings from previous research conducted years ago

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Humans are a gregarious species; we rely on our conspecifics for our health and welfare (Snyder-Mackler et al, 2020). Physically distancing from other humans is shown to be intertwined with a feeling of distress for many individuals (Rajkumar, 2020). The conventional notion is that, with scanty opportunity to socially interact with others, the mental state of many individuals, as could be determined by such measures such as the perceived stress scale (an instrument designed to appraise how much individuals deem the situations in which they are stressful), would be deteriorated. Et al (2002) directly found that social connectedness is correlated with perceived stress amongst men and women alike. Those previous studies were done under circumstances that were much different to what we are

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call