The relationship between lymphocyte subsets, nutritional status and tuberculin reactivity in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis patients

This retrospective study was designed to compare the cause of hospitalization and influencing factors between patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD). Baseline data and laboratory parameters of 192 dialysis patients (92 HD patients and 100 PD patients) were compared. Quantitative parameters with normal distribution were assessed using independent t-test or analysis of variance (ANOVA). Quantitative parameters with non-normal distribution were assessed by non-parametric test. Qualitative data were statistically compared using χ2 test. The number of patients with urban employee medical insurance (88 HD patients and 60 PD patients) and rural cooperative medical care (12 HD patients and 40 PD patients) significantly differed (P < .01). The hospitalization rate of PD patients was significantly higher than that of HD counterparts. The average length of hospital stay of PD patients was 10 days, remarkably longer than 8 days of HD patients (P < .01). The primary cause of hospitalization for HD patients was infection-related complications, followed by cardiovascular, cerebrovascular complications and dialysis access disorders. The primary cause of hospitalization for PD patients was infection-related complications, followed by dialysis access disorders, cardiovascular, and gastrointestinal complications. Compared with the HD group, the levels of hemoglobin, serum albumin, alkaline phosphatase, intact parathyroid hormone were significantly decreased, whereas serum urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, phosphorus levels and cardiothoracic ratio were remarkably increased in the PD group (all P < .01). The hospitalization rate of PD patients is relatively higher, and the length of hospital stay is longer. Extensive attention and efforts should be delivered to enhance the understanding of disease and lower the risk of complications for patients.

Background and Aims Skin test anergy is common in patients with uremia and during maintenance hemodialysis treatment. However, up to date only one study concerning skin test in peritoneal dialysis patients has focused on the issue. Our cross-sectional controlled study was conducted to analyze the correlation of purifed protein derivative (PPD) test response with demographical features, nutritional parameters and the distribution of peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets in peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis patients. Method Stable 30 hemodialysis (HD) patients (16 men, 14 women) and 30 continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients (17 men, 13 women) were included. Thirty healthy cases (15 men, 15 women) with a mean age of 32.4±9.4 constituted the control group. Results In the HD group, 14 patients (46.6%) were PPD positive, and ın the PD group 16 patients (53.3%) were PPD positive. In the PPD-positive HD patients 64.2% (9/14), and in the PPD-positive PD patients 62.4% (10/16) had an induration of 10 mm or greater. In the control group, 21 of 30 patients (70%) were PPD positive. Comparison of both HD and PD groups with the control group showed signifcant diferences in PPD reactivity (p&amp;lt;0.01). Albumin levels were signifcantly high in the control groups (p&amp;lt;0.01), and cholesterol levels were signifcantly high in the PD and the control groups (p&amp;lt;0.05). Transferrin levels were signifcantly high in the PD (p&amp;lt;0.01). The lymphocyte counts were signifcantly high in the control group compared to the HD patients (p&amp;lt;0.05). The lymphocyte subset percentages CD19 were high in the control groups (p&amp;lt;0.05), and CD16/56 was signifcantly high in the PD groups (p&amp;lt;0.05). All the parameters were also similar between PPD-positive and -negative same groups. Conclusion The prevalence of PPD positivity was lower in the PD and HD groups. The PPD test responses were not related to the peripheral lymphocyte counts, subsets and malnutrition parameters.

Background and Aims Apathy is a distinct syndrome manifesting with a loss of interest in social or emotional situations, lack of sense of purpose, low energy levels and detachment from life and personal events. Previous studies showed that apathy is associated with vascular impairment and consequent cognitive dysfunction, reduced quality of life and increased hospitalization, institutionalization, healthcare costs and death. So far there has been little research on the prevalence of apathy among dialysis patients although this population could be considered at risk for this condition due to increasing age, and disease and treatment burden. Fatigue is also common in dialyzed patients and impacts daily living, impairs the quality of life, increases the risk of cardiovascular events and negatively influences survival. This study aimed to explore the link between apathy and fatigue among hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Method We conducted a cross-sectional cohort study which included 75 HD (57.3% male, median age 64 years) and 62 PD patients (48.4% male, median age 61 years) from two dialysis centres. Apathy status was assessed by the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES) by Starkstein. Fatigue was evaluated with the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) scale. AES score of 14 and higher denotes the presence of apathy, while a FACIT score of less than 30 indicates severe fatigue. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were obtained by a focused questionnaire and from electronic medical records. Data were analyzed with T-test, Hi-square, ANOVA and Pearson correlation as applicable. Results HD patients were significantly longer on dialysis than PD patients (p=0.046). Apathy was more frequent among PD patients compared to the HD group (64.5% vs 48%), but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.053). Severe fatigue was more frequent in the HD group (33.8% vs 27.4%), but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.424). Elderly patients had a higher prevalence of apathy in both HD (70.3% vs 29.7%, p&amp;lt;0.001) and PD groups (84.2% vs 16.3%, p = 0.008), and a significantly higher prevalence of severe fatigue in the HD group (68% vs 32%, p = 0.017). Among HD patients higher education level was significantly associated with higher FACIT and lower apathy scores (p = 0.002 and p = 0.001 respectively). HD patients taking psychotropic medication had significantly lower FACIT (27.2±13.5 vs 35.0 ± 11.9, p = 0.03). Also, the presence of apathy was significantly associated with lower hemoglobin levels (101.7±9.7 vs 110.3±11.2, p = 0.001), red blood cells count (3.2±0.2 vs 3.5±0.6, p = 0.004), lower serum creatinine (900.0±149.1 vs 1001.5±266.4, p = 0.047) and lower Kt/V (1.35±0.22 vs 1.49±0.24, p = 0.008) in the HD group, while PD patients with severe fatigue had significantly higher creatinine levels (796.7±176.9 vs 646.4±200.0, p = 0.009). Gender, dialysis vintage, primary renal disease, and comorbidities were not significantly associated with either apathy or fatigue in either group of patients. Apathy and fatigue were significantly correlated in both the HD (p = 0.04) and the PD (p = 0.001) groups. Conclusion Apathy is a highly prevalent and often overlooked condition among dialyzed patients regardless of dialysis modality. Longitudinal studies should explore whether apathy is a causative factor for fatigue in these populations.

Background/Aims: To examine the relationship of extracellular fluid (ECF) volume and osmotic excess with treatment modality, we retrospectively analyzed spontaneous body weight loss and osmotic excretion versus true body weight after kidney transplantation in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients and preemptive transplant recipients compared with hemodialysis (HD) patients. We also examined maximum bladder volume in other transplant recipients on PD. Methods: From 2005 to 2011, 42 PD patients underwent kidney transplantation at our institution. Patients aged <12 years and cadaveric transplantations were excluded; we enrolled 27 PD patients (PD group; age 35.7 ± 14.4 years at transplantation; dialysis duration 36.5 ± 31.2 months) and 14 adult preemptive kidney transplant patients (preemptive group; age 31.7 ± 15.7 years; estimated glomerular filtration rate 8.26 ± 1.8 mL/min/1.73 m² at transplantation). From 2005 to 2006, 29 adult living-related donor kidney transplant recipients on HD support (HD group) were enrolled as controls (age 36.4 ± 11.3 years; dialysis duration 37.5 ± 55.2 months). Results: Percentage body weight loss at 1 month after transplantation was 5% from ideal body weight for the PD group (51.2 ± 14.3 to 48.6 ± 13.0 kg, p = 0.002), 5.1% for the preemptive group (56.7 ± 17.4 to 53.8 ± 16.5 kg, p = 0.0005), and 1% for the HD group (52.9 ± 12.4 to 52.1 ± 12.5 kg, p = 0.079); post-transplantation 24-h osmotic excretion was greater in the PD and preemptive groups (387.3 ± 175.7 mOsm) groups than in HD (250 ± 124 mOsm; p = 0.006. Another 69 adult living-related donor kidney transplant recipients (PD and HD support) with dialysis duration ≤5 years were examined. Mean dialysis duration differed in the HD (17.5 ± 13.1 months) and PD (29.6 ± 20.4 months, p = 0.015) groups; mean urine volume and maximum desire to void (MDV) were similar. Conclusion: ECF volume and osmotic excess occurred in the PD and preemptive groups compared with the HD group pre-transplantation. Although PD maintains MDV and residual and total urine volume, ECF volume and osmotic excess should be monitored before transplant; pre-transplant HD support should always be considered in PD and preemptive transplant patients.

A clinical study to investigate gum infection in patients on kidney dialysis

Reply to the letter regarding the article 'Efficacy and safety of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibition in heart failure patients with end-stage kidney disease on maintenance dialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis'.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare psychosocial characteristics in caregiving relatives (caregivers) of hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Thirty-three caregivers (17 women, 16 men) of HD patients, 27 caregivers (11 women, 16 men) of PD patients, and a control group of 49 subjects who do not care for family members with chronic illness (23 women, 26 men) are included in this study. The brief symptom inventory (BSI), social disability schedule (SDS), and brief disability questionnaire (BDQ) were used for the psychosocial evaluation. The mean age, men-to-women ratios, duration of education, and distribution of marital status did not differ significantly among the three groups. In addition, dialysis duration and distribution of caregiver type were not different between the HD and PD groups. Although the mean global severity index scores of the three groups were similar, somatization and depression scores from BSI subitems were greater in the HD group than the scores of the PD and control groups. Although the mean SDS and BDQ scores were higher in the HD group, the differences did not achieve statistical significance. BSI subitems such as somatization, obsession-compulsion, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, and anxiety were positively correlated among themselves. Hostility and somatization were negatively correlated with age and education, respectively. Nevertheless, somatization was positively correlated with age. Social disability was negatively correlated with duration of education. Somatization and depression are greater in the caregivers of center HD patients compared to PD and control groups. According to the findings of this study, we suggest that caregiving family members of dialysis patients especially on HD also should be evaluated for psychosocial problems and supported as needed. Further studies are needed to explore whether psychosocial parameters of caregivers predict outcomes for caregivers and patients.

BackgroundEnd-stage kidney disease (ESKD) substantially impacts different aspects of patients' lives, including mental and physical health, and overall quality of life. The aim of our study is to assess the quality of life (QoL) and the associated predictors in ESKD Saudi Arabian patients receiving either hemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD). Saudi Ministry of health (MOH) is advancing dialysis care in the country with more focus on patients’ satisfaction and QoL. However, the data regarding QoL in Saudi Arabian dialysis patients is limited.MethodsA cross sectional study was carried out using Kidney Disease Quality of Life scale (KDQOL-36) to assess the QoL. We disturbed a validated formal arabic version of the questionnaire. Patients older than 18-year-old and attending dialysis clinics in Aseer region, Saudi Arabia, were invited to participate in the study.ResultsA total of 152 responses were analyzed, which were separated into two primary groups: the HD group (98 patients) and the PD group (54 patients). Our results showed no significant differences between the two groups except for the KDQOL-SF-36 physical composite score at which the PD group had a higher mean than the HD group 44.75 vs 37.84, respectively (p < 0.001). However, more PD patients reported feeling depressed compared to HD patients.ConclusionsKidney Disease Quality of Life scale scores were comparable between HD and PD groups except for the physical composite score. On the other hand, PD patients tend to suffer from depression more than HD patients. Interventions to attenuate the physical deconditioning and depressive symptoms in HD and PD patients, respectively, are crucial. Future prospective studies with larger sample sizes are warranted.

It is unclear whether clinical courses of hungry bone syndrome (HBS) after parathyroidectomy (PTX) in peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) patients are different. The present study aimed to investigate the possible differences of postoperative hypocalcemia and hyperkalemia between PD and HD patients. We performed retrospectively 29 PD patients as the PD group and 169 HD patients as the HD group undergoing successful total PTX with autotransplantation. Calcium supplement after surgery was recorded. Higher levels of serum potassium during and immediately after surgery were recorded as K+d0. K+d3 was recorded as peak pre-dialysis serum potassium level 3days post-surgery. There were 157 (92.90%) patients in HD group and 22 (75.86%) patients in PD group suffered from HBS after surgery, with significant difference between the groups (P = 0.004). Patients in PD group had significantly shorter intravenous calcium supplement duration (P = 0.037) and significantly smaller intravenous calcium supplement dosage (P = 0.042) and total calcium supplement dosage during hospitalization (P = 0.012) than patients in HD group. The levels of serum K+d0 (P < 0.001) and K+d3 (P < 0.001) were both significantly lower in PD group than those in HD group. Peritoneal dialysis was one of the independent influencing factors with negative correlation for calcium supplement, serum K+d0 and serum K+d3. Compared with HD patients, the clinical course of HBS after PTX in PD patients was alleviated. Efforts should be devoted to individual perioperative management for PD patients undergoing PTX.

Background/Aims: This study aimed to investigate the level of soluble tumor necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis (sTWEAK) and its correlation with micro-inflammation and atherosclerosis in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Methods: This retrospective study involved 23 healthy subjects (control group), 23 hemodialysis (HD) patients (HD group) and 26 PD patients (PD group). Serum biochemical measurements and sTWEAK assessments were tested. The association between intima-media thickness (IMT) and sTWEAK concentrations was evaluated. Results: The TWEAK level was lower in PD (155.16 ± 3.69 pg/mL, p < 0.001) and the HD group (150.16 ± 7.23 pg/mL, p < 0.001) than that in the control group (193.05 ± 5.36 pg/mL), with no significant difference between the PD group and the HD group. In the PD and HD groups, sTWEAK was significant negatively correlated with CPR, fibrinogen, and white blood cell (p < 0.05). Besides, compared to lower sTWEAK concentration end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients (no >161.9 pg/mL), patients who had a higher level of sTWEAK (>161.9 pg/mL) had a lower IMT (0.97 ± 0.04 vs. 0.84 ± 0.03 cm, p = 0.029). After adjusted for sex, age, hypertension, diabetes, duration of dialysis, triglyceride, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, and serum glucose, sTWEAK (B = –0.002, r = 0.015) and CRP (B = 0.022, r = 0.015) were independent risk factors for the IMT of ESRD patients. Conclusion: Plasma TWEAK is inversely associated with carotid IMT among patients undergoing HD and PD.

BackgroundNutritional factors are associated with high mortality and morbidity in dialysis patients, and protein-energy wasting is regarded as an important one. The modality of dialysis may affect patients’ dietary behavior and nutritional status, but no study has compared the dietary behavior, nutrient intake, and nutritional adequacy of hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients.MethodsFrom December 2016 to May 2017, a dietary behavior survey and Semi-quantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire (Semi-FFQ) were conducted on 30 HD patients and 30 PD patients in Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, and laboratory parameters were obtained. The results of prevalent HD and PD patients were then compared.ResultsThe mean age of HD patients was higher than that of PD patients; HD: 58.5 ± 9.1 years, PD: 49.3 ± 9.7 years (p = 0.001). In the dietary behavior survey, HD patients showed more appropriate dietary behavior patterns overall than PD patients. In the dietary intake analysis with the Semi-FFQ, energy intake was significantly lower in the PD group than in the HD group due to the lower intake of carbohydrates, fat, and protein. A comparison of nutrient intake-to-recommended allowance ratio between the HD and PD groups revealed that the HD group showed higher nutrient intake than the PD group. Serum albumin and potassium levels were significantly higher in HD than in PD patients.ConclusionAccording to this study, the dietary behavior and nutritional intake of prevalent PD patients were worse than those of HD patients.

Dialysis patients are susceptible to developing severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) due to hypoimmunity. Antibody titers against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) after the primary vaccinations are lower in hemodialysis (HD) patients than in healthy individuals. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a SARS-CoV-2 booster vaccination in HD and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients based on antibody titers and cellular and humoral immunity. Participants of the control, HD, and PD groups were recruited from 12 facilities. SARS-CoV-2 antigen-specific cytokine and IgG-antibody levels were measured. Regulatory T cells and memory B cells were counted using flow cytometry at 6months after primary vaccination with BNT162b2 and 3weeks after the booster vaccination in HD and PD patients and compared with those of a control group. Booster vaccination significantly enhanced the levels of antibodies, cytokines, and memory B cells in three groups. The HD group showed significantly higher levels of IgG-antibodies, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-17, and memory B cells than those in the control group at 3weeks after the booster dose. The PD group tended to show similar trends to HD patients but had similar levels of IgG-antibodies, cytokines, and memory B cells to the control group. HD patients had significantly stronger cellular and humoral immune responses than the control 3weeks after the booster dose. Our findings will help in developing better COVID-19 vaccination strategies for HD and PD patients.

Objective To compare the survival rates of elderly hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients and identify their independent prognostic predictors. Methods Patients aging >60 years old who initiated dialysis between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2014 were included. Propensity score method (PSM) was applied to adjust for selection bias. Kaplan-Meier method was used to obtain survival curves and a Cox regression model was used to evaluate risk factors for mortality. Results 447 eligible patients with maintenance dialysis were identified, 236 with hemodialysis and 211 with peritoneal dialysis. 174 pairs of patients were matched, with the baseline data [age, gender, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and the primary disease] between two groups showing no significant difference (P >0.05). Cardiovascular events, cerebrovascular events and infection were major causes of death in both groups and there was no significant difference in the causes of death between two groups (P >0.05). The overall survival rates at 1 and 5 year were 93.6% and 63.4% respectively in HD group, 91.9% and 61.5% in PD group. The differences of total survival rates between HD and PD patients were not significant (P >0.05). Cox regression analysis showed age (≥80 year) (P <0.001, HR=1.058, 95% CI 1.028-1.088), diabetic nephropathy (P=0.001, HR=2.161, 95%CI 1.384-3.373), CCI≥5 (P=0.007, HR=1.935, 95%CI 1.201-3.117) were independent prognostic risk predictors in HD patients; age(≥80 year) (P=0.022, HR=1.043, 95% CI 1.006-1.081), serum albumin level <35 g/L (P=0.025, HR=1.776, 95%CI 1.075-2.934), and prealbumin (P=0.012, HR= 0.968, 95% CI 0.944-0.993) were independent prognostic predictors in PD patients. Conclusions The differences of total survival rates between aged HD and PD patients are not significant. Age, diabetic nephropathy, CCI≥5 and age, serum albumin 30 g/L respectively influence the survival of elderly HD and PD patients. Key words: Aged; Hemodialysis; Peritoneal dialysis; Survival rate

Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients Recieving Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis in São Paulo, Brazil: A Longitudinal Study

Objectives. To evaluate the influence of early nephrology referral on clinical outcome in patients on maintenance hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD). Patients and Methods. This study retrospectively analyzed patients entering our HD and PD program from February 2000 to June 2003. Patients who presented to a nephrologist more than 6 months before starting dialysis were defined as early referral (ER). Meanwhile, patients transferred to the nephrology department less than 6 months before initial dialysis were considered late referral (LR). Results. HD Groups. Of 78 HD patients, 37 (47.1%) qualified for the ER group and 41 (52.6%) were designated to the LR group. The demographic data were analyzed for both the HD and PD groups. No significant differences in average age at dialysis, duration of hemodialysis, and gender were noted between these two groups. The same applied for the biochemical parameters in both groups. HD patients with early referral had significantly better survival (p < .05) as plotted with the Kaplan‐Meier method. In univariate analysis by cox proportional hazards mode, the early referral in HD patients [Exp (Coef) = 0.426, P < .01] significantly influenced survival. The various variables were further examined by multivariate analysis, and early referral, hemoglobin, and age still significantly impacted patient survival (P < .05). CAPD Groups. The survival curve related to early referral in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CADP) patient survival rate was significantly higher for the early referral groups (P < .05). In addition, a multivariate analysis adjusting for several potential risk factors found that referral time remained significantly associated with patient survival. In additional, hemoglobin and age were significant and independent predictors of mortality. Conclusion. This study demonstrates that time between referral and starting dialysis is a predictor of survival for both HD and PD patients, with early referral being associated with longer survival time. These analytical results suggest that early referral before dialysis is important in determining long‐term prognosis in HD and PD patients.