The relationship between judgments of successiveness

Abstract

The purpose of the present set of experiments was to determine the nature of the relationship between judgments of successiveness and judgments of order. The relationship was examined in terms of models which assume that the perception of successiveness is sufficient for the perception of correct temporal order. It was demonstrated that successiveness and order judgments cannot be jointly explained by perceptual latency models which assume that both judgments are based on the same internal event. This is the case regardless of the form of the perceptual latency distribution, and for either a threshold or a nonthreshold decision process. On the other hand, performance on a successiveness discrimination task, an order discrimination task, and a task requiring both a successiveness and an order judgment on each trial is consistent with the predictions of the attention-switching model.