Abstract

Aim: The study aims to gather under a single roof a meta-analysis of the relationship between job satisfaction and burnout in healthcare workers, carried out in OECD countries, and to obtain a general result. Method: Unlike similar methodologies employed in assessing the correlation between job satisfaction and job performance in international literature, the study employed the meta-analysis technique in its methodology. For this aim, the literature was systematically reviewed, and 35 specific studies meeting the established criteria were included. The initial step involved uploading these studies into the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis V3 program and subsequently coding them for analysis. Before commencing the study analysis, the decision was made regarding the model for the effect size calculation, with preference given to the random effects model. Following this, the analysis encompassed effect size determination, examination of publication bias, and execution of subgroup analyses. Results: Considering the prominent findings of the study, a negative and significant relationship was found between job satisfaction and burnout. The individual studies included in the study do not have publication bias. There exists a statistically significant difference among countries concerning the correlation between job satisfaction and burnout. Conclusion: The structure and functioning of countries' health systems are unique and different. The effects of this situation are also reflected in the findings of the study. To increase the satisfaction of healthcare professionals, human resources strategies specific to the dynamics of each country should be determined and implemented, and the results should be monitored.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call