Abstract

Executive functions have been described as the “brain of the brain” and to include a variety of processes, including, but not limited to, abstraction, formulation of intentions, reasoning, formulation of strategies, monitoring their success, working memory, and the self-regulation of behavior. Executive functions have been determined to be associated with the integrity of the frontal lobes. On the other hand, intelligence has also been described in similar terms, and the concept of general intelligence, or the g factor has also been associated with the frontal lobes. As constructs, intelligence and executive functions have been also described as “overlapping” in many features, while maintaining a certain degree of conceptual independence. The purpose of this study was to compare the intellectual functioning of a sample of patients with mild traumatic brain injury, obtained by means of the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales (RIAS), with their performance in a number of neuropsychological measures of executive functions, such as the Halstead Category Test (HCT), the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), the Stroop Word and Color Test (SWCT), and the Trail Making Test (TMT). Pearson Product Moment Correlations were obtained between the various measures of the RIAS and the measures of executive functions (HCT, WCST, SWCT, TMT). Whereas the magnitudes of the correlations were within the moderate range, intelligence, particularly non-verbal intelligence and working memory were noted to be significantly correlated with the measures of executive functions. The conclusion was reached that intelligence and executive functions are related to each other as constructs, but yet maintain a certain degree of independence.

Highlights

  • Introduction and Literature ReviewAccording to Tirapu-Ustárroz et al (2017), the term executive functions was proposed for the first time by neuropsychologist Muriel D

  • The purpose of this study was to compare the intellectual functioning of a sample of patients with mild traumatic brain injury, obtained by means of the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales (RIAS), with their performance in a number of neuropsychological measures of executive functions, such as the Halstead Category Test (HCT), the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), the Stroop Word and Color Test (SWCT), and the Trail Making Test (TMT)

  • Pearson Product Moment Correlations were obtained between the various measures of the RIAS and the measures of executive functions (HCT, WCST, SWCT, TMT)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

According to Tirapu-Ustárroz et al (2017), the term executive functions was proposed for the first time by neuropsychologist Muriel D. Lezak (1982) who defined it as mental capacities essential to carry out effective, creative, and socially accepted behavior with four components: formulation of goals (ability to generate and select the desirable states in the future), planning (selection of actions, means and sequences necessary to reach goals), development (ability to initiate, stop, maintain, and change among planned behaviors), and implementation (ability to monitor and correct behaviors). For Lopera-Restrepo (2008), executive function refers to the directing, managerial, and guiding function of the brain. Friedman & Miyake (2017) described executive functions as high-level cognitive processes that, through their influence on lower-level processes, allow individuals to regulate their thoughts and actions during behavior aimed at the attainment of goals

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call