Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyse the possibility for firms to consider institutional settings to systematically direct dispersed individual efforts of discovery and invention towards objects (products or processes) of their interest in order to enhance their value creation capacity. Design/methodology/approach The authors conduct a comparative analysis of the different institutional settings within which software products are invented and produced – closed producer-centred model, open user-centred model, and hybrid interactive producer-user model. Findings The authors draw indications regarding the possibility to design institutional settings for value creation and the potential pitfalls tied to these strategic tools. Originality/value A theoretical framework is elaborated in order to understand the different ways in which institutional contexts influence and direct value creation processes. The model analysed shows the firms’ deliberate attempt to stimulate a dynamic process of social interaction and communication which may foster higher levels of creativity and innovation. In order to guarantee the necessary accessibility and to sufficiently motivate external programmers towards the perception of a new code, the firm has to surrender the traditional source through which it appropriates value: barriers to the accessibility of the code developed through IPRs. The adoption of an institutional setting which facilitates dynamic value creation processes suggests, therefore, the need to turn to dynamic mechanisms for value appropriation in parallel.

Highlights

  • Strategy literature distinguishes value creation from value appropriation processes (Mocciaro Li Destri and Dagnino, 2005; Lepak et al, 2007)

  • More seldom is the analysis of firms’ active influence on institutional contexts, while we find some notable examples in unorthodox economics (North, 1994; Nelson, 1998)

  • The brief description of the building blocks underlying the creation of hybrid development models in the software industry shows that firms are beginning to consider institutional setting definition as a strategic tool which needs to be intentionally managed in order to re-align the social structure in which software development occurs to the contradicting necessities of value appropriation and value creation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Strategy literature distinguishes value creation from value appropriation processes (Mocciaro Li Destri and Dagnino, 2005; Lepak et al, 2007). The former process entails the creation of new sources of competitive advantage through innovation: it consists on the intuition and implementation of new resource combinations or the development of new competences or knowledge able to elevate the level of efficiency within the economic system considered. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode

Objectives
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call