Abstract

BackgroundRwanda has made great progress in improving reproductive, maternal, and newborn health (RMNH) care; however, barriers to ensuring timely and full RMNH service utilization persist, including women’s limited decision-making power and poor-quality care. This study sought to better understand whether and how gender and power dynamics between providers and clients affect their perceptions and experiences of quality care during antenatal care, labor and childbirth.MethodsThis mixed methods study included a self-administered survey with 151 RMNH providers with questions on attitudes about gender roles, RMNH care, provider-client relations, labor and childbirth, which took place between January to February 2018. Two separate factor analyses were conducted on provider responses to create a Gender Attitudes Scale and an RMNH Quality of Care Scale. Three focus group discussions (FGDs) conducted in February 2019 with RMNH providers, female and male clients, explored attitudes about gender norms, provision and quality of RMNH care, provider-client interactions and power dynamics, and men’s involvement. Data were analyzed thematically.ResultsInequitable gender norms and attitudes – among both RMNH care providers and clients – impact the quality of RMNH care. The qualitative results illustrate how gender norms and attitudes influence the provision of care and provider-client interactions, in addition to the impact of men’s involvement on the quality of care. Complementing this finding, the survey found a relationship between health providers’ gender attitudes and their attitudes towards quality RMNH care: gender equitable attitudes were associated with greater support for respectful, quality RMNH care.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that gender attitudes and power dynamics between providers and their clients, and between female clients and their partners, can negatively impact the utilization and provision of quality RMNH care. There is a need for capacity building efforts to challenge health providers’ inequitable gender attitudes and practices and equip them to be aware of gender and power dynamics between themselves and their clients. These efforts can be made alongside community interventions to transform harmful gender norms, including those that increase women’s agency and autonomy over their bodies and their health care, promote uptake of health services, and improve couple power dynamics.

Highlights

  • Rwanda has made great progress in improving reproductive, maternal, and newborn health (RMNH) care; barriers to ensuring timely and full RMNH service utilization persist, including women’s limited decision-making power and poor-quality care

  • The Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) indicated that only 44% of women attended the recommended four antenatal care (ANC) visits – which has since been increased by the World Health Organization (WHO) to a recommended eight visits – and only 56% of women sought ANC before their fourth month of pregnancy [1]

  • The paper presents findings related to maternal health services, including ANC, labor and childbirth. This mixed methods study was conducted in Rwanda by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Maternal and Child Survival Program (MCSP), through Promundo-US, and in collaboration with the Rwanda Ministry of Health and the Rwanda Biomedical Center

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rwanda has made great progress in improving reproductive, maternal, and newborn health (RMNH) care; barriers to ensuring timely and full RMNH service utilization persist, including women’s limited decision-making power and poor-quality care. Rwanda has made great progress in improving reproductive, maternal, and newborn health (RMNH) care by investing in health workforce development, scaling up service provision, and increasing the demand for, accessibility and quality of health services. By 2015, most women attended at least one antenatal care (ANC) visit (99.0%) and gave birth in a health facility (90.7%) [1]. The DHS noted that barriers to women’s care seeking or to timely care were varied and multiple, but included cost, the distance to the health facility, and women’s limited decision-making power [1]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.