Abstract
One hundred six cataractous eyes of 78 patients were evaluated to examine the relationship between indoor and outdoor Snellen visual acuity. While 81 of all cataractous eyes (76.4%) had Snellen visual acuities of 20/40 or better when tested indoors, only 33 eyes (31.2%) had 20/40 or better Snellen visual acuities when tested outdoors facing the sun. When tested indoors, only three eyes (2.8%) had Snellen visual acuities worse than 20/80, while 31 eyes (29.2%) had outdoor Snellen visual acuities worse than 20/80. Ten eyes (9.4%) had outdoor Snellen visual acuities worse than 20/200. Seventy-four eyes (69.8%) had outdoor visual acuities that were at least two Snellen lines worse than those measured indoors and 23 eyes (21.7%) had outdoor visual acuities that were at least five Snellen lines worse. The median difference between indoor and outdoor visual acuity was three Snellen lines. The need for increased precision in the ability to assess outdoor “real world” vision while in the ophthalmologist's examination room is discussed. Clearly, indoor Snellen visual acuity alone is insufficient to evaluate functional visual impairment in cataract patients.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
