Abstract
Objectives The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between gesture and speech in the preschool children with expressive language impairment (E-SLI). Methods Thirty-six preschool children-12 E-SLI, 12 typically developing children matched for chronological age (CA-TD), and 12 typically developing children matched for language age (LA-TD)- completed a picture naming task and a description task. Three-way mixed analysis of variance was used to analyze the modality of expression, the types of gestures, and the semantic relationship between gestures and co-occurring speech. Results The frequency of âspeech + gestureâ in children with E-SLI was significantly higher than in CA-TD children. In addition, the frequency of âonly speechâ and âspeech + gestureâ in children with E-SLI was similar to that in LA-TD children. In terms of the gesture types, children with E-SLI used significantly more deictic gestures than CA-TD children did. Further, the frequency of representational gestures in children with E-SLI was similar to that of LA-TD children. Conclusion In educational and clinical settings, it is important to acknowledge that the gestures accompanying with limited verbal expression in children with E-SLI deliver additional semantic information. Therefore, it is essential for educators and clinicians to carefully examine the use of gestures when treating children with E-SLI . Keywords: speech & gesture, expressive specific language impairment, nonverbal communication
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.