Abstract
Male rats were killed 2 months (early fibrosis) or 6 months (peak fibrosis) after a range of single doses of 60Co gamma rays to the right hemithorax. Pulmonary arterial perfusion scans were performed at 2 months on animals scheduled for autopsy at 6 months. Lung angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) activity was used to monitor endothelial function, and hydroxyproline (HP) concentration served as an index of interstitial collagen accumulation (fibrosis). ACE activity also was measured in right lung bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid and blood serum, to determine whether information obtained from a minimally invasive procedure might serve as an index or predictor of the severity of lung damage. Linear dose-response curves ( r = 0.92–0.99) were obtained for right lung arterial perfusion, ACE activity and HP concentration. At 2 months, perfusion decreased 2.7% per Gy, ACE activity (per lung, per mg wet weight, or per mg protein) decreased 3.0–4.2% per Gy, and HP concentration (per g dry weight) increased 1.7% per Gy. At 6 months, the slopes of the response curves were virtually identical to those at 2 months; the Y intercept of the response curve for ACE activity was unchanged, whereas that for HP concentration was 50% higher at 6 than at 2 months. ACE activity and protein concentration in the BAL increased with increasing dose, but the variation within groups was too large, and the sensitivity was too low to serve as a reliable index of lung status. Serum ACE activity was independent of radiation dose at both autopsy times. Thus in rat lung, arterial perfusion, endothelial dysfunction and interstitial fibrosis exhibit similar but not identical radiosensitivities. The dose-effect curves for these three responses of the lung in situ change less than 5% per Gy over the dose range of 10–30 Gy, a smaller variation than would be predicted from endothelial cell survival data based on clonogenic assays in vitro or in vivo.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.