The relationship between climate change and malaria in South-East Asia: A systematic review of the evidence

Background: Climatic change is an inescapable fact that implies alterations in seasons where weather occurrences have their schedules shift from the regular and magnitudes intensify to more extreme variations over a multi-year period. Southeast Asia is one of the many regions experiencing changes in climate and concurrently still has endemicities of malaria. Given that previous studies have suggested the influence of climate on malaria's vector the Anopheles mosquitoes and parasite the Plasmodium group, this study was conducted to review the evidence of associations made between malaria cases and climatic variables in Southeast Asia throughout a multi-year period. Methods: Our systematic literature review was informed by the PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO: CRD42022301826 on 5 th February 2022. We searched for original articles in English and Indonesian that focused on the associations between climatic variables and malaria cases. Results: The initial identification stage resulted in 535 records of possible relevance and after abstract screening and eligibility assessment we included 19 research articles for the systematic review. Based on the reviewed articles, changing temperatures, precipitation, humidity and windspeed were considered for statistical association across a multi-year period and are correlated with malaria cases in various regions throughout Southeast Asia. Conclusions: According to the review of evidence, climatic variables that exhibited a statistically significant correlation with malaria cases include temperatures, precipitation, and humidity. The strength of each climatic variable varies across studies. Our systematic review of the limited evidence indicates that further research for the Southeast Asia region remains to be explored.

The American Psychiatric Association Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients With Eating Disorders.

Methods and Results Report - Evidence and consensus-based (S3) Guidelines for the Treatment of Actinic Keratosis -International League of Dermatological Societies in cooperation with the European Dermatology Forum.

2013 AHA/ACC Guideline on Lifestyle Management to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk

Genomic screening of the general adult population: key concepts for assessing net benefit with systematic evidence reviews.

Systematic reviews of the evidence on the nature, extent and effects of food marketing to children. A retrospective summary

Protocol for a systematic review: Interventions addressing men, masculinities and gender equality in sexual and reproductive health: An evidence and gap map and systematic review of reviews.

Since 1980, the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and American Heart\nAssociation (AHA) have translated scientific evidence into clinical practice\nguidelines with recommendations to improve cardiovascular health. These\nguidelines, based on systematic methods to evaluate and classify evidence,\nprovide a cornerstone of quality cardiovascular care.

It is not clear why people who identify as Black or Hispanic are less likely to undergo discretionary musculoskeletal surgery such as arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. Inequities and mistrust are important factors to consider. The role of socioeconomic factors and variation in values, attitudes, and beliefs regarding discretionary procedures are less well understood. A systematic review of the evidence regarding mindsets toward knee and hip arthroplasty among Black and Hispanic people could inform attempts to limit disparities in care. In a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative evidence, we asked: (1) What factors are associated with racial and ethnic variations in attitudes toward discretionary hip and knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis? (2) Do studies that investigate racial and ethnic variations in mindsets toward discretionary orthopaedic care control for potential confounding by socioeconomic factors? A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase (last searched August 2023) for studies that addressed racial and ethnic variations in mindsets toward discretionary musculoskeletal care use was conducted. We excluded studies that were not published in English, lacked full-text availability, and those that documented patient approaches without comparing them to the willingness to undergo a discretionary procedure. Twenty-one studies were included-14 quantitative and seven qualitative-including 8472 patients. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used for quality assessment of included studies. The studies included demonstrated low risk of bias: five quantitative studies lacked detail regarding nonresponse bias and one qualitative study lacked details regarding the racial and ethnic composition of its cohort. To answer our first research question, we categorized themes associated with racial differences in mindsets toward discretionary care and recorded the presence of associations in quantitative studies. To answer our second question, we identified whether quantitative studies address potential confounding with socioeconomic factors. There were no randomized trials, so no meta-analysis was performed. In general, self-identified Black and Hispanic patients had a lower preference for hip and knee arthroplasty than self-identified White patients. Black patients were more likely to regard osteoarthritis as a natural and irremediable part of aging and prefer home remedies. Both Black and Hispanic patients valued support from religion and were relatively cost-conscious. Black and Hispanic patients had lower perception of benefit, were less familiar with the procedure, had higher levels of fear regarding surgery and recovery, and had more-limited trust in care. Generally, Black and Hispanic social networks tended to address these concerns, whereas White social networks were more likely to discuss the benefits of surgery. Thirteen of 14 quantitative studies considered and accounted for potential confounding socioeconomic variables in their analyses. The observation that lower preference for discretionary arthroplasty among Black and Hispanic patients is independent from socioeconomic factors and is related to accommodation of aging, preference for agency (home remedies), greater consideration of costs, recovery concerns, and potential harms directs orthopaedic surgeons to find ways to balance equitable access to specialty care and discretionary surgery while avoiding undermining effective accommodation strategies. It is important not to assume that lower use of discretionary surgery represents poorer care or is a surrogate marker for discrimination. Level III, therapeutic study.

Blue-collar work and women's health: A systematic review of the evidence from 1990 to 2015

The impact of COVID-19 on essential health service provision for endemic infectious diseases in the South-East Asia region: A systematic review.

BackgroundPrognosis research aims to identify factors associated with the course of health conditions. It is often challenging to judge the overall quality of research evidence in systematic reviews about prognosis due to the nature of the primary studies. Standards aimed at improving the quality of primary studies on the prognosis of health conditions have been created, but these standards are often not adequately followed causing confusion about how to judge the evidence.MethodsThis article presents a proposed adaptation of Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE), which was developed to rate the quality of evidence in intervention research, to judge the quality of prognostic evidence.ResultsWe propose modifications to the GRADE framework for use in prognosis research along with illustrative examples from an ongoing systematic review in the pediatric pain literature. We propose six factors that can decrease the quality of evidence (phase of investigation, study limitations, inconsistency, indirectness, imprecision, publication bias) and two factors that can increase it (moderate or large effect size, exposure-response gradient).ConclusionsWe describe criteria for evaluating the potential impact of each of these factors on the quality of evidence when conducting a review including a narrative synthesis or a meta-analysis. These recommendations require further investigation and testing.

Artistic research studies produce a felt and often physically embodied type of knowledge initiated in an artistic experience and consolidated as an art form. The actual art work as the outcome of these studies, complements other types of knowledge and therefore requires attention from systematic review authors who synthesize evidence from primary studies. Working with artistic research evidence in a systematic review context requires a different approach to searching, appraising, analysing and integrating research findings than what is usually promoted by international review organisations. In this paper we outline how the different steps in a systematic review process can be adapted to include art work as as a multimodal type of research evidence in systematic reviews. We discuss useful tactics of identifying artistic research evidence, judging its value, analysing and synthesizing such evidence, hereby building on iconographic, thematic and/or art and design related analytical frameworks. In addition, we feature a gallery approach to present artistic research evidence to end-users and feature a multimodal type of evidence synthesis in which individual art works are comprehensively integrated in an audio visual production.

Potential value of systematic reviews of qualitative evidence in informing user-centered health and social care: findings from a descriptive overview

Preamble and Transition to ACC/AHA Guidelines to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk S50 The goals of the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) are to prevent cardiovascular diseases (CVD); improve the management of people who have these diseases through professional education and research; and develop guidelines, standards, and policies that promote optimal patient care and cardiovascular health. Toward these objectives, the ACC and AHA have collaborated with the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) and stakeholder and professional organizations to develop …