Abstract

Abstract We use a quantitative model of apatite fission track (AFT) annealing to constrain the thermal evolution of a sedimentary basin and its margin. Apatites deposited in a basin contain several types of information. Provided temperatures remained below ≅70°C, they retain much of their provenance thermal signatures and mainly record the thermal evolution of their source area. Above 70°C, the fission tracks in apatite rapidly fade, reflecting the thermal evolution of the basin. Therefore, downhole AFT dates in a well section can in principle be used to assess both the provenance detail (from shallow/cool samples) and the subsequent thermal history in the basin (from the deeper samples).We apply this concept to the south Norwegian offshore and onshore using AFT and ZFT (zircon fission track) data; the latter constrain maximum palaeotemperatures and provide additional provenance information. AFT and ZFT data from three offshore wells in the northern North Sea are shown to contain a record of palaeogeographical and tectonic evolution, closely associated with the Norwegian basement. ZFT data from Middle Triassic sediments suggest a Permian volcanic source. Modelling of AFT data from Jurassic sediments presently residing at temperatures below 70°C indicate rapid cooling during the Late Triassic to Early Jurassic, similar to onshore AFT data. During the Cretaceous minor sediment supply was derived from the Norwegian basement, as evidenced by ZFT ages that do not correlate to the onshore, suggesting that parts of southern Norway were covered with sediments at this time. At the end of the Palaeogene and during the Neogene, the south Norwegian basement again became a major source of elastics.AFT and ZFT data indicate that all wells are presently at maximum temperatures. No significant (> 500 m) erosion events are indicated in the three wells since the Jurassic. AFT data have not yet effectively equilibrated to present‐day temperatures as nonzero fission track ages are maintained in sediments currently at temperatures of > 120°C. This implies that the present‐day thermal regime has only recently been installed. Probable causes include rapid subsidence and an increase in the geothermal gradient during the last 5 Myr.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.