Abstract

Background: Understanding the morphological characteristics between the floor of the maxillary sinus and the tips of the maxillary posterior roots is crucial in orthodontics involving diagnosis and treatment planning. The aim of this study was to evaluate the distances from the maxillary posterior root apices to the inferior wall of the maxillary sinus, thickness and density of maxillary sinus floor using cone-beam computed tomography images and the relationships between roots and maxillary sinus according to gonial angle and skeletal pattern. Materials and methods: Three-dimensional images of each root were checked, and the distances were measured along the true vertical axis from the apex of the root to the sinus floor, and the thickness and density of maxillary sinus floor in 60 patients (30 males, 30 female) aged 18 to 25 years. Evaluation of the differences between groups which classified to gonial angle and skeletal pattern which were done according to the comparsion between the mean statistic tests. Results: results showed that the density of floor of maxillary sinus at the first molar roots region in class III were significantly lower than class I and II, also the distance between the floor of maxillary sinus and both distobuccal and palatal roots of first molar were significantly lower in class I than other classes, while the thickness of maxillary sinus floor at the distobuccal root of first molar were significantly higher in class III than other classes. In gonial angle difference, the maxillary sinus floor density and distance to the maxillary posterior roots had no significant difference in all groups, while the thickness of maxillary sinus floor at distobuccal and palatal of second molar roots region were significantly higher in large gonial angle than small and normal angles. Conclusion: subjects with class I skeletal pattern have small distance between the maxillary sinus floor and the maxillary posterior roots due to the pneumatisation of maxillary sinus causing more difficult and time consuming orthodontic treatment.

Highlights

  • In adults, the maxillary sinus differs in its projection due to the presence of ‘Hillocks’ which are elevations in the surface of sinus floor that occur in 50 % of population when the floor projects among adjacent teeth or roots [1]

  • The aim of this study was to assess the relationships between maxillary posterior roots and maxillary sinus floor according to skeletal pattern, and gonial angle by using cone beam computed tomography images which include measuring the distances between maxillary posterior root apices and inferior wall of maxillary sinus, the cortical bone thickness and density of maxillary sinus floor in the region closest to the root apices and in the furcation areas

  • Descriptive statistics and Class difference of the distance between floor of maxillary sinus and root apex of maxillary posterior teeth: The longest distance between the sinus floor and root apices seen in class I with no protrusion at the second premolars, and the more protruded roots into the sinus were the palatal roots of the first molars that found in class I

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The maxillary sinus differs in its projection due to the presence of ‘Hillocks’ which are elevations in the surface of sinus floor that occur in 50 % of population when the floor projects among adjacent teeth or roots [1]. In these cases, the sinus floor thickness is clearly diminished. The aim of this study was to evaluate the distances from the maxillary posterior root apices to the inferior wall of the maxillary sinus, thickness and density of maxillary sinus floor using cone-beam computed tomography images and the relationships between roots and maxillary sinus according to gonial angle and skeletal pattern. Conclusion: subjects with class I skeletal pattern have small distance between the maxillary sinus floor and the maxillary posterior roots due to the pneumatisation of maxillary sinus causing more difficult and time consuming orthodontic treatment

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call