Abstract
Error and correct response times were calculated for a serial choice task with two, four, and eight alternatives over five sessions practice. Error RTs were faster than corresponding correct RTs and varied in the same way as the correct RTs with different numbers of alternatives and degree of practice. Error RT were analyzed in detail according to sequential transitions. Eighty-five per cent of errors directly following errors were attempts at error correction. These results are discussed in terms of serial classification and statistical decision models.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
