Abstract
Arguments for and against the regulation of shadow banking are presented, evaluated and weighed against each other. Two strong arguments for the regulation of shadow banking are that the system provides the opportunity for regulated banks to circumvent regulation and that it is a major source of systemic risk. Regulatory proposals are also discussed and evaluated. The conclusion that is reached following the discussion is that it does not make sense to regulate depository institutions while giving shadow banking entities a free hand to do what they like.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
