Abstract
We examine the regulatory design of a market for products with interdependent demands, where regulated firms provide (imperfect) substitutes and can engage in lobbying activities. Under centralized regulation, a single regulator is established, whose mandate is to maximize aggregate welfare. Under decentralized regulation, each firm is assigned to a regulator charged with maximizing the welfare generated by that firm. With asymmetric cost information, centralized regulation results in a negative externality between firms when engaging in lobbying. Decentralized regulation removes this externality and reduces lobbying. Since this benefit comes at the cost of miscoordination between regulators, a trade-off results which favors decentralized regulation when goods are substitutes enough.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
