Abstract

Background and objectivesFractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) are the two most commonly used coronary indices of physiological stenosis severity based on pressure. To minimize the effect of wedge pressure (Pwedge), FFR is measured during hyperemia conditions, and iFR is calculated as the ratio of distal and aortic pressures (Pd/Pa) in the wave-free period. The goal of this study was to predict Pwedge using the backward wave (Pback) through wave separation analysis (WSA) and to reflect the effect of Pwedge on FFR and iFR to identify the relationship between the two indices.MethodsAn in vitro circulation system was constructed to calculate Pwedge. The measurements were performed in cases with stenosis percentages of 48, 71, and 88% and with hydrostatic pressures of 10 and 30 mmHg. Then, the correlation between Pback by WSA and Pwedge was calculated. In vivo coronary flow and pressure were simultaneously measured for 11 vessels in all patients. The FFR and iFR values were reconstructed as the ratios of forward wave at distal and proximal sites during hyperemia and at rest, respectively.ResultsBased on the in vitro results, the correlation between Pback and Pwedge was high (r = 0.990, p < 0.0001). In vivo results showed high correlations between FFR and reconstructed FFR (r = 0.992, p < 0.001) and between iFR and reconstructed iFR (r = 0.930, p < 0.001).ConclusionsReconstructed FFR and iFR were in good agreement with conventional FFR and iFR. FFR and iFR can be expressed as the variation of trans-stenotic forward pressure, indicating that the two values are inferred from the same formula under different conditions.

Highlights

  • Background and objectivesFractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio are the two most commonly used coronary indices of physiological stenosis severity based on pressure

  • This event is explained by backward-propagating suction-waves in wave intensity analysis (WIA) and loss

  • Instantaneous wave-free ratio (IFR) could be measured when ­Wedge pressure (Pwedge) is minimized during the wave-free period of diastole without hyperemia

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) are the two most commonly used coronary indices of physiological stenosis severity based on pressure. To minimize the effect of wedge pressure ­(Pwedge), FFR is measured during hyperemia conditions, and iFR is calculated as the ratio of distal and aortic pressures ­(Pd/Pa) in the wave-free period. The goal of this study was to predict ­Pwedge using the backward wave ­(Pback) through wave separation analysis (WSA) and to reflect the effect of ­Pwedge on FFR and iFR to identify the relationship between the two indices. The ­Pwedge wave is characterized by rapid decline in and formation of baseline in pre-systole [5] This event is explained by backward-propagating suction-waves in wave intensity analysis (WIA) and loss. IFR could be measured when ­Pwedge is minimized during the wave-free period of diastole without hyperemia

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.