Abstract
The objective of this study is to examine the reasoning behind donation decisions of donor-eligible patients' next-of-kin. Cases were identified through chart review at hospitals in Ohio and Pennsylvania. Family decision makers of donor-eligible patients (N = 420) were interviewed to understand decisions regarding organ donation. Responses to inquiries regarding donation decisions were recorded verbatim and then categorized into major themes. Patterns of reasons to donate or not were examined to identify trends. Logistic regression was employed to explore the associations between decision-maker characteristics and donation decision. Most families gave more than one reason for their decision. Respondents who chose to donate most frequently mentioned altruistic reasons for their decision (78%). However, this response was almost never provided as a single reason. Seventy-five percent of families attributed the decision to the patient's explicit communication of a desire to donate. The belief that the patient did not want to donate was cited by 51% of families who did not donate; 36% of these families cited this as the sole reason for not donating. Concerns about disfigurement and feelings of emotional exhaustion also played a significant role. Reasons to donate or not are complex. Altruism, although important, does not seem to be sufficient to motivate organ donation. Knowing patient's preferences was a stronger influence overall. Moreover, certain reasons were highly correlated with each other. Supportive emotional care for the family and reassurance and information about the donation process are indicated as important issues to address to encourage donation.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection & Critical Care
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.