Abstract
The article is devoted to eliminating the inconsistency of the use of the terms "reason" and "motive" of countering criminal prosecution, which takes place in forensic literature devoted to this topic. Thus, similar in content phenomena (actions, decisions, facts), which initiate the emergence of counteraction relations, different scientists are called differently: in one case reasons, in the other - motives. On the basis of the analysis of forensic practice and doctrinal sources, special features of reasons and motives of counteraction to criminal prosecution were characterized, definition of their concepts was given.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
