Abstract

This paper provided results of a framework-based self-reflection process conducted by the science and the practice leaders of two transdisciplinary projects realized in co-leadership from 2011 until 2014. It analyzes from the perspectives of the science and practice leaders for the whole research process including preparation, research, and follow-up phase, the (1) transdisciplinarity component of each module (in %); (2) outputs generated (tangible and intangible); (3) relevance of output for science and practice (qualitative ranking); (4) impacts emerging from the outputs (tangible and intangible); and (5) outcomes emerging from the impacts (tangible and intangible). Furthermore, the research process was reflected by practice and science project leaders and critical aspects identified. We found that first, a transdisciplinary research process might contribute to regional demands if it is carried out “timely.” Timeliness includes (1) the need from the perspective of the practice partners and the scientific community, (2) the willingness of the co-leaders to develop the project together, and (3) the fundamental organizational support. This was the case in our project where the results directly impacted the further development of the project. Second, a truly lived co-leadership consisting of clearly defined and lived roles and responsibilities, common definition and alignment of the goals, and acceptance of the differences in needs by practice and science leads to a trustful cooperation. Third, a good communication structure within the teams and between the practice and science teams allows to anticipating and overcoming problems at the practice-science interface leading to mutual learning and experience building.

Highlights

  • Society is facing major global challenges like the damage or loss of resources or climate change (Ostrom 2009), which might threaten the livelihood of this very society

  • This paper provided results of a frameworkbased self-reflection process conducted by the science and the practice leaders of two transdisciplinary projects realized in co-leadership from 2011 until 2014

  • This paper provided results of a framework-based self-reflection process conducted by the science and the practice leaders of two transdisciplinary projects realized in coleadership from 2011 until 2014

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Society is facing major global challenges like the damage or loss of resources or climate change (Ostrom 2009), which might threaten the livelihood of this very society. Transdisciplinary research (TDR) has been claimed to be able to do so (Hirsch Hadorn et al 2008a) This type of research (1) substantially includes actors from outside academia, (2) deals with socially relevant real-world, ‘wicked’ problems, (3) aims at mutual learning processes by including the knowledge from different scientific disciplines, Sustain Sci (2015) 10:545–562 and from actors outside science, and (4) creates knowledge that is solution-oriented in a way that it generates results that are relevant to both practice and science (Defila et al 2006; Scholz et al 2006; Lang et al 2012; Mauser et al 2013). The co-generation of knowledge in transdisciplinary research is not a linear process, but occurs in an iterative, reflexive cycle (Lang et al 2012)

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call