Abstract
The determination of the real, or active, area of a catalytic surface is a key requirement to understand or quantify parameters related to its electrochemical behavior. There are several experimental methods available, but none of them seems to be universally applied in literature. The choice of method is particularly important when evaluating electrodes made from materials that may interact with the analyte such as gold (Au) and palladium (Pd). A comparable analysis has therefore been made which includes four in situ methods (oxide formation, double layer capacitance, iodine adsorption and electrocatalysis of the Hexacyanoferrate (II/III) reductant-oxidant couple), and two ex situ methods (scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy). It was found that measurements of oxide formation and the double layer capacitance gave the largest real surface area whereas scanning electron microscopy gave the smallest. Considering nanoporous Pd electrodes, the surface area ratio (the ratio between the real and geometric surface area) ranged from 0.8 (scanning electron microscopy) to 75.4 (oxide formation) and 76.5 (double layer capacitance). The corroboration between the results suggests that oxide formation and double layer capacitance provide the most accurate way of determining the real surface area for the electrode system investigated in this paper.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
More From: Journal of The Electrochemical Society
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.