Abstract

There is a discussion about common or various mechanisms of response inhibition and response switching. To understand these mechanisms, we used a modified Go/NoGo task with three stimulus categories. The subjects were instructed to press a button in response to frequent Go stimuli, press another button in response to rare Go stimuli and hold any motor response following the presentation of NoGo stimuli. The results showed a decrease in reaction time for frequent Go, following both categories of rare stimuli and the decrease was greater following rare Go. Also, the total number of errors did not differ between Go and NoGo, however, a greater bias of error rate towards frequent Go stimuli was found for rare Go compared to NoGo. Finally, positive correlations were found between the increase in reaction time for rare Go compared to frequent Go and the number of errors for both rare Go and rare NoGo. Together, these results indicate that both rare Go and NoGo stimuli required to inhibit the prepotent response, but rare Go in comparison to NoGo stimuli also evoked a conflict between prepotent and alternative responses, which is expressed in greater response bias toward frequent Go.

Highlights

  • Behavior flexibility includes both reaction inhibition and reaction switching, relationship between them is not clear

  • Our results demonstrate that reaction time (RT) for fGo does not differ from Rare Go stimuli (rGo)-1 (p = 0.294, Bonferroni correction) and NoGo-1 (p = 1.000, Bonferroni correction)

  • We found that RT for fGo was longer as compared to rGo+1 (p < 0.001, Bonferroni correction) and NoGo+1 (p < 0.001, Bonferroni correction) (Table 1 and Figure 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Behavior flexibility includes both reaction inhibition and reaction switching, relationship between them is not clear. There are different opinions about its underlying mechanisms. Some authors [1,2,3] claim the existence of a common mechanism for inhibiting and switching reactions. Other researchers [4,5,6] suggest the existence of separated mechanisms. Inhibition is considered as a particular stage in response switching to cancel out an inappropriate response [7,8]. The Stop-Signal task (SST) and the Go/NoGo are the most used tasks to study response inhibition

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call