Abstract
This study explores the integration attempt between Taiwan and China during the period from 2008 to 2016, focusing on the perspective of Taiwan civil society, as both the initiation and the deadlock of the cross‐strait integration during this period were primarily triggered by Taiwan. This research adopts functionalist theory, as the design of integration derived from neo‐functionalism and the deadlock of integration would be better explained by politicization, which constitutes the emphasis of post‐functionalism. The findings demonstrate that different extents of politicization made the fates of the two major integration attempts during that period (Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement and Cross‐Strait Service Trade Agreement) dissimilar. It is further concluded that common identity is the key factor for cross‐strait integration in the future.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
