Abstract

Cohorts of rats with excitotoxic retrosplenial cortex lesions were tested on four behavioural tasks sensitive to dysfunctions in prelimbic cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, or both. In this way the study tested whether retrosplenial cortex has nonspatial functions that reflect its anatomical interactions with these frontal cortical areas. In Experiment 1, retrosplenial cortex lesions had no apparent effect on a set-shifting digging task that taxed intradimensional and extradimensional attention, as well as reversal learning. Likewise, retrosplenial cortex lesions did not impair a strategy shift task in an automated chamber, which involved switching from visual-based to response-based discriminations and, again, included a reversal (Experiment 2). Indeed, there was evidence that the retrosplenial lesions aided the initial switch to response-based selection. No lesion deficit was found on an automated cost-benefit task that pitted size of reward against effort to achieve that reward (Experiment 3). Finally, while retrosplenial cortex lesions affected matching-to-place task in a T-maze, the profile of deficits differed from that associated with prelimbic cortex damage (Experiment 4). When the task was switched to a nonmatching design, retrosplenial cortex lesions had no apparent effect on performance. The results from the four experiments show that many frontal tasks do not require the retrosplenial cortex, highlighting the specificity of their functional interactions. The results show how retrosplenial cortex lesions spare those learning tasks in which there is no mismatch between the internal and external representations used to guide behavioural choice. In addition, these experiments further highlight the importance of the retrosplenial cortex in solving tasks with a spatial component.

Highlights

  • Important clues to retrosplenial cortex function come from its connectivity

  • It is clear that the retrosplenial cortex has a very different role in spatial cognition from that of the hippocampus and anterior thalamic nuclei

  • For the first four sessions of this phase of training, all trials were forced and the trial structure was the same as for the final session of the previous stage. Both the low reward (LRwd) and high reward lever (HRwd) levers were reinforced on an FR4 schedule but, for trials in which the HRwd lever was presented, the animals received 4 food pellets whilst only two pellets were delivered for LRwd trials

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Important clues to retrosplenial cortex (areas 29, 30) function come from its connectivity. Sensitive to lesions centred in prelimbic cortex [28] These medial frontal lesions produce a selective deficit on extradimensional setshifting, the ability to switch from one class of reinforced cues to another [28], while more selective anterior cingulate lesions can impair intradimensional set-shifting [29]. In Experiment 2, a second cohort of rats with retrosplenial lesions was tested on a strategy switch task in an automated chamber This task involved learning and shifting between visual-based and response-based discriminations, switches that are sensitive to inactivation of the medial frontal cortex in rats (Ragozzino et al [31]; Floresco et al [30]). The various behavioural tasks were selected to determine whether retrosplenial cortex lesions have effects similar to those seen after lesions in the anterior cingulate or prelimbic cortices

Experiment 1: attentional set–shifting
Methods
Results
Experiment 2: strategy-shift
Experiment 3: cost-benefit discrimination
General discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call