Abstract

The inconsistency between the time-reversible Liouville equation and time-irreversible Boltzmann equation has been pointed out by Loschmidt. To avoid Loschmidt’s objection, here we propose a new dynamical system to model the motion of atoms of gas, with their interactions triggered by a random point process. Despite being random, this model can approximate the collision dynamics of rigid spheres via adjustable parameters. We compute the exact statistical steady state of the system, and determine the form of its marginal distributions for a large number of spheres. We find that the Kullback–Leibler entropy (a generalization of the conventional Boltzmann entropy) of the full system of random gas spheres is a non-increasing function of time. Unlike the conventional hard sphere model, the proposed random gas system results in a variant of the Enskog equation, which is known to be a more accurate model of dense gas than the Boltzmann equation. We examine the hydrodynamic limit of the derived Enskog equation for spheres of constant mass density, and find that the corresponding Enskog–Euler and Enskog–Navier–Stokes equations acquire additional effects in both the advective and viscous terms.

Highlights

  • It is known that the atoms in an electrostatically neutral monatomic gas interact via the Lennard–Jones potential [1]

  • To avoid Loschmidt’s objection [14] and derive the Boltzmann equation in a consistent fashion, we propose a new random process to model the underlying hard sphere dynamics, where the changes in the velocities of the spheres still obey the mechanics of the rigid sphere collision, but the

  • We examine the hydrodynamic limit of the Enskog equation for spheres of constant mass density, as it appears to be physically plausible for atoms of the noble gases [23]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It is known that the atoms in an electrostatically neutral monatomic gas interact via the Lennard–Jones potential [1]. To avoid Loschmidt’s objection [14] and derive the Boltzmann equation in a consistent fashion, we propose a new random process to model the underlying hard sphere dynamics, where the changes in the velocities of the spheres still obey the mechanics of the rigid sphere collision, but the “collisions” themselves are triggered by a point process This random dynamical system possesses the infinitesimal generator, so that the corresponding forward Kolmogorov equation for its probability density is readily available via the integration by parts. We examine the hydrodynamic limit of the Enskog equation for spheres of constant mass density, as it appears to be physically plausible for atoms of the noble gases [23] In this limit, we find that the resulting Enskog–Euler and Enskog–Navier–Stokes equations acquire additional non-vanishing terms, which are not present in the conventional gas dynamics equations originating from the Boltzmann equation [7,8,9,10,13]. These additional effects disappear in the dilute gas approximation, which yields the usual Boltzmann, Euler, and Navier–Stokes equations, respectively

The Hard Sphere Collision Model and the Boltzmann Equation
The Liouville Problem for Two Spheres
The BBGKY Identity for Two Spheres
The Boltzmann Hierarchy and Boltzmann Equation
Inconsistencies in the Derivation of the Boltzmann Equation
A Contradiction between the Liouville Problem and the Boltzmann Hierarchy
A Contradiction between the Liouville Problem and the Boltzmann Closure
Reversibility and Loschmidt’s Objection
Our Proposal to Correct the Inconsistency
Random Dynamics of Hard Spheres
A Dynamical System Driven by an Inhomogeneous Point Process
Random Dynamics of Two Spheres
Extension to Many Spheres
A Two-Sphere Solution along a Characteristic
A Steady Solution for Many Spheres
Entropy Inequality
The Structure of Marginal Distributions of the Physical Steady State
The Marginal Distributions in the Limit of Infinitely Many Spheres
The forward Equation for the Marginal Distribution of a Single Sphere
Approximating the Two-Sphere Marginal via One-Sphere Marginals
Thin Contact Zone and Impenetrable Spheres
The Fluid Dynamics of the Enskog Equation in a Physical Hydrodynamic Limit
The Mass-Weighted Equation and the Hydrodynamic Limit
The Euler Equations
The Newton and Fourier Laws
The Navier–Stokes Equations
Summary
Results

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.