The Racial Differences in the Clinical Outcomes of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been reported to significantly reduce major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) compared with angiography-guided PCI. We aimed to explore whether there were racial differences regarding the beneficial effects of IVUS-guided PCI. Randomized controlled trials for comparison of clinical outcomes between IVUS-guided and angiography-guided PCI were retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to March 15, 2023. The clinical outcomes included MACE, all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), target lesion revascularization (TLR), and stent thrombosis (ST). Finally, 18 randomized controlled trials were included in this study (8 in East Asian patients and 10 in Western patients). Results showed that IVUS-guided PCI was associated with a significant reduction of MACE, TVR, TLR, and ST, but not all-cause mortality and MI in both East Asian and Western patients. The reduction of MACE was more significant in East Asian patients (odds ratio [OR] 0.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.46 to 0.70) than that in Western patients (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.02). Meta-regressionanalysis revealed that the country the study was performed in (East Asian vs Western countries) was associated with significant heterogeneity between groups, suggesting that racial differences existed (p=0.033). In conclusion, IVUS-guided PCI was associated with a lower risk of MACE, TLR, TVR, and ST, but not all-cause mortality and MI in both East Asians and Westerners. East Asians benefited more than Westerners upon using IVUS-guided PCI in reducing MACE, suggesting that racial differences do exist between different imaging methods. Larger-sample studies are warranted for further clarification of our findings.