Abstract
This paper examines the ‘natural/artificial’ dichotomy in the context of health-related technology, illustrated here by the issue of communication with deaf people. Since representation and technology form an intrinsic part of human ‘nature’ and human lives, the distinction between the ‘natural’ and the ‘artificial’ is problematic if intended as a reference to specific characteristics of human bodies, capabilities or activities (e.g. the use of prostheses or sign language for communication). Instead, this dichotomy serves as a linguistic device employed in order to justify preferred (‘natural/ normal/healthy’) forms of life. The diverse ways in which the concept ‘natural’ has been linked with spoken and sign language and the use of auditory aids can hence be shown to be equivocal and contradictory; for example, promotion of spoken language as more ‘natural’ than sign language is associated paradoxically with the implantation in deaf children of electronic aural prostheses.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
