Abstract

In 1884, the novel Monsieur Venus took the French literary world by storm, and inaugurated its controversial female author, Rachilde, the ‘queen of decadence.’ Many critics did not believe that a young, aristocratic woman could possibly have devised such a salacious story. A literary press which specialized in erotica first published the book, but it was banned regardless, and Rachilde was even condemned to prison for pornographic writing. Subsequent editions therefore required fake male co-authors and introductions by famous male writers that consigned the novel not literature at all, but the case study of a hysterical woman. Rachilde also publicly denounced the feminism of her moment, a proclamation that affected the twentieth-century reception of her writing. Yet, following new French and English editions published in 2004, Monsieur Venus has been hailed a queer forerunner in contemporary academic circles, even while questions about Rachilde’s feminist affiliations persist. This paper goes beyond the biographical details that have dominated conversation about Rachilde’s writing to closely interrogate the use of sexual violence in Monsieur Venus, and in her much lesser-known novel, La Marquise de Sade (1887). Based on the definition of sadomasochism Gilles Deleuze outlines in his book, Masochism: Coldness and Cruelty (1991), the respective use of masochism in Monsieur Venus and of sadism in La Marquise de Sade places its female characters in the unlikely positions of masochist and sadist to offer a provocative critique of the decadent moment, and its representations of sexuality, the body, and even nationalism.

Highlights

  • Many critics did not believe that a young, aristocratic woman could possibly have devised such a salacious story

  • Based on the definition of sadomasochism Gilles Deleuze outlines in his book, Masochism: Coldness and Cruelty (1991), the respective use of masochism in Monsieur Vénus and of sadism in La Marquise de Sade places its female characters in the unlikely positions of masochist and sadist to offer a provocative critique of the decadent moment, and its representations of sexuality, the body, and even nationalism

  • Despite the misogynistic critical reception of her works due to her status as a female author, Rachilde herself been considered a misogynist, in part because, hesitant to affiliate with the political feminist movements of her day, she published an essay in 1928, Pourquoi je ne suis pas féministe, that has persisted in affecting the reception of her work

Read more

Summary

88. Original text

Elle ne le frappait plus, elle ne l'achetait plus, elle le flattait, et l'homme, si abject qu'il puisse être, possède toujours, à un moment de révolte, cette virilité d'une heure qu'on appelle la fatuité. The first time Raoule sees Jacques nude, he is compared to a famous statue of Venus: Worthy of the Venus Callipyge, that curve of his lower back where his spine ran down to a voluptuous plane rose firm, fat, in two adorable contours, and looked like a transparent amber sphere of Paros. His thighs were a bit less thick than women's thighs, and yet possessed a solid roundness that concealed their sex.. Deleuze claims that the preponderance of marble statues in Masoch’s writing represents the severity characteristic of nineteenth-century ‘repression of sensuality’, Musser, 2005. Ibid., p

40. Original text
12. Original text
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call