Abstract
Ultrasonic root-end preparation techniques have recently been introduced and revolutionized the field of endodontic surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare quantitatively the quality of root-end preparation techniques prepared by a specially designed ultrasonic retrotip with those prepared in a traditional manner by a microhandpiece bur. Twenty roots with two canals and an isthmus from extracted maxillary human molars were selected for this study. After instrumentation, obturation, and root-end resection, root-end preparations were made using either an ultrasonic retrotip or a conventional microhandpiece bur. With the aid of the image processing and analysis system, the specimens were inspected under a stereomicroscope for further evaluation of the quality of the shape and size of preparation. The results of this investigation showed that the ultrasonic root-end preparations produced more conservative and less perforated cavities than those made with conventional microhandpiece bur preparations.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
