Abstract

Materials and methods We have evaluated 69 consecutive patients (39 male and 30 female) operated for rectal cancer in our ward. The preoperative investigation includes, according to guidelines for CRC treatment: pancolonscopy, chest radiography and a CT scan of the abdomen. The most appropriate surgical treatment was chosen depending on the results of the preoperative study (Table 1). A standard questionnaire investigating the quality of life was administered to all the patients in the preoperative time (t0), in the early postoperative time(t1) and 3 (t2), 6 (t3), 9 (t4) and 12 (t5) months after the operation. Our questionnaire, the same as EORTC QLQ-C30 [1], QLQ-C38 [2] and SF-36 [3], is composed of the items described in Table 2. Results All the patients enrolled in the study answered our questionnaire. 31 of the patients underwent anterior resection of the rectum with total mesorectal excision(ARR), 24 underwent lower anterior resection (Low ARR), 9 underwent ultra-low anterior resection (Ultra-low ARR), 1 underwent Hartmann resection, 1 underwent abdominoperineal resection sec. Miles and 3 patients were treated by endoscopical resection (Table 3). A temporary stoma was made in 32 patients, and a definitive one in 2 patients. The stoma was made only in the patients with an elevated risk of anastomotic leakage. The overall complication rate was 20.2%, interesting 14 patients of the total as described in the table 4.

Highlights

  • The aim of this study is to investigate the quality of life (QOL) in patients treated surgically for rectal cancer

  • Materials and methods We have evaluated 69 consecutive patients (39 male and 30 female) operated for rectal cancer in our ward

  • The most appropriate surgical treatment was chosen depending on the results of the preoperative study (Table 1)

Read more

Summary

Background

The aim of this study is to investigate the quality of life (QOL) in patients treated surgically for rectal cancer. We will evaluate different surgical treatments, complications, presence and absence of a protective or definitive stoma and how this can influence the patient’s quality of life

Materials and methods
Results
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.