Abstract

BackgroundThe Quality of Life Impact Refractive Correction (QIRC) questionnaire is a Rasch-validated instrument to assess the quality of life of ametropes with refractive correction. The original QIRC was validated in the United Kingdom. This study aimed to validate the Malay version of the QIRC among refractive correction wearers in Malaysia using Rasch analysis.MethodsThe original 20-item QIRC was forward-backward translated into Malay in preparation for the Pilot Malay QIRC. The pilot version was pre-tested on 105 spectacle/contact lens-corrected myopes, and the results were reviewed and cross-culturally adapted to produce the Final Malay QIRC. The final version was self-administered to a new sample of 304 participants. A Rasch analysis was conducted to evaluate the items and response categories of the Pilot and the Final Malay QIRC. Test-retest reliability was also analysed on the Final Malay QIRC.ResultsBased on the pre-test findings, Rasch analysis revealed a multidimensional scale (functional scale [Items 1 to 13] and emotional scale [Items 14 to 20], which were separated in subsequent analysis), unordered response categories for the functional scale (Category 3 was collapsed into Category 2), one misfit item (Item 3 was removed) and six items required modification (Items 4, 6 to 9, and 12 were reworded and cross-culturally adapted). In the Final Malay QIRC, both the functional and emotional scales had ordered response categories, good person reliability (functional, 0.80; emotional, 0.81) and separation index (functional, 2.01; emotional, 2.06), well-targeted items (targeting precision: functional, 0.28 logits; emotional, 0.08 logits), and satisfactory fit statistics (infit and outfit mean square were less than 1.50 for all items). A noticeable differential item functioning (DIF) between genders was found in Item 18 (DIF contrast, 0.40 logits; p = 0.04). Test-retest reliability analysis demonstrated a high intraclass correlation coefficient (0.94) and Cronbach’s alpha (0.97) with a coefficient of repeatability of ±8.14 units.ConclusionsThe Malay-translated version of the QIRC has good psychometric characteristics for assessing the quality of life of refractive correction wearers in Malaysia. This translated and cross-culturally adapted Malay QIRC is a valid and reliable instrument that can be used in routine clinical practice.

Highlights

  • Uncorrected refractive error is the leading cause of low vision in Malaysia and even worldwide [1, 2]

  • Further analysis of the standardised residual loadings revealed that all emotional items (Items 14 to 20) had residual loadings of greater than 0.60. These findings indicated that the Malay Quality of Life Impact Refractive Correction (QIRC) was a multidimensional scale

  • This finding is in line with those found in existing works, where Ang et al [34] analysed the original QIRC, and Kaphle et al [9] validated the Chichewa QIRC, reporting similar observations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Uncorrected refractive error is the leading cause of low vision in Malaysia and even worldwide [1, 2]. All refractive correction methods aim to restore clear vision, which concomitantly improves the quality of life (QoL) of ametropes. The information derived from this objective clinical measure is subtle to represent the overall visual function improvement after the correction given. Patient self-evaluated QoL provides the patient’s perspective on visual function improvement with the refractive correction to complement the objective clinical measure. The combination of the objective and subjective measures offers a holistic assessment to reflect the overall improvement in visual function and patient’s satisfaction. The Quality of Life Impact Refractive Correction (QIRC) questionnaire is a Rasch-validated instrument to assess the quality of life of ametropes with refractive correction. This study aimed to validate the Malay version of the QIRC among refractive correction wearers in Malaysia using Rasch analysis

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call