Abstract
Abstract There is a growing literature discussing the incentives of analysts to disseminate cash flow forecasts and the quality of these forecasts. Most studies support the ‘demand hypothesis’ and suggest that cash flow forecasts contain information additional to that provided in earnings forecasts. In contrast, Givoly et al. (2009) show that cash flow forecasts are just a simple extrapolation of analysts’ earnings forecasts. In response to this challenge, Call et al (2013) point out that the regression tests in Givoly et al (2009) are non-diagnostic due to the measurement problem contained in the US dataset. We suggest that Givoly et al. ’s (2009) method can be well applied in China since Chinese data do not have the same measurement problem as that contained in US data. By replicating the studies of Givoly et al. (2009) and Call et al. (2013), we find results consistent with Givoly et al. (2009) that analysts’ cash flow forecasts appear to be naïve extensions of their earnings forecasts in China.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.