Abstract
Shakespeare was a pervasive presence in the life and work of C. L. R. James, and, along with cricket, was one of the veteran radical's most abiding concerns. In this essay, I set out to explore some of the implications of James' Shakespeare criticism. In Shakespeare's plays, particularly Hamlet and King Lear, James traced the historical provenance of some of the critical problematics of human society, and outlined a challenging method of dialectical literary criticism. This method attended to seemingly contradictory critical tasks, historicism and universalism, allowing James to use Shakespeare as an occasion for dialectical analyses which went far beyond literary criticism alone. James understood Shakespeare as both a historical and contemporary phenomenon, and by exploring how he is able to think both these possibilities at once, it is possible to trace his unique understanding of the critical relationship between the past and the present, and the role of creative activity in mediating between them.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
