Abstract
Gas-based ultrasound (US) contrast agents increase erythrocyte sonolysis, presumably via enhancing inertial cavitation (IC) activity. The amount of IC activity (IC “dose”) and hemolysis generated by exposure to 1.15 MHz US were examined with different US pulse lengths, but with the same delivered acoustic energy, for Optison® and Albunex®. The hypotheses were that 1. at longer pulse lengths, IC would generate more bubbles that could nucleate additional IC activity; 2. if the interval between pulse pairs were short enough for the next pulse to hit derivative bubbles before their dissolution, more IC could be induced; and 3. hemolysis would be proportional to IC activity. Two types of studies were performed. In the first, bubble generation after each burst of IC activity was quantified using an active cavitation detector (ACD), for different pulse lengths (5, 10, 20, 30, 50, 100 or 200 cycles), but the same pressure level (3 MPa) and total “on” time (173.16 ms). Low concentrations of either Optison® or Albunex® were added into the tank with high-intensity and interrogating transducers orthogonal to each other. For pulse lengths > 100 cycles, and pulse repetition intervals < 5 ms, a “cascade” effect (explosive bubble generation) was observed. In the second, IC was measured by passive detection methods. IC dose and hemolysis were determined in whole blood samples at a pressure level (3 MPa) and interpulse interval (5 ms) that induced the “cascade” effect. Each blood sample was mixed with the same number of contrast microbubbles (Optison® ∼ 0.3 v/v % and Albunex® ∼ 0.5 v/v %), but exposed to different pulse lengths (5, 10, 20, 30, 50, 100 or 200 cycles). With Optison®, up to 60% hemolysis was produced with long pulses (100 and 200 cycles), compared with < 10% with short pulses (5 and 10 cycles). Albunex® generated considerably less IC activity and hemolysis. The r 2 value was 0.99 for the correlation between hemolysis and IC dose. High pulse-repetition frequency (PRF) (500 Hz) generated more hemolysis than the low PRF (200 Hz) at 3 MPa. All experimental results could be explained by the dissolution times of IC-generated bubbles. (E-mail: wschen@duke.edu)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.