Abstract

With the advent of social media, fake news, conspiracy theories, and misinformation have emerged as major societal concerns. But why do citizens disseminate untrustworthy information online? I examine this question by testing how identification with societal groups affects citizens’ uptake of malevolent rumors about competing groups. I test the theoretical expectations in a survey study administered to large groups of majority Danes and ethnic minorities living in Denmark. The results show that participants identifying as Danes or immigrants are much more likely to believe and share malevolent rumors about the other group, and that these associations are mostly driven by outgroup anger rather than ingroup love. The article deepens our understanding of majority-minority relationships in a digital world as well as the challenges that must be overcome in order to stop the spread of online misinformation.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call