Abstract

Participation in victim-offender mediation (VOM) can reduce the risk of reoffending. However, relatively little is known about how VOM affects the intermediate psychological changes underlying this effect. It was hypothesized that VOM increases feelings of responsibility, guilt, and shame among offenders as well as empathy toward the victim. It was also expected that VOM leads to feelings of moral failure among offenders, increasing their intention to desist, and improving their relation with the victim, relatives, and community. Lastly, it was hypothesized that offenders may experience reduced rejection, concerns about condemnation, threat to their social moral identity, and victim blame following VOM. To this end, we compared psychological changes in offenders who participated in a VOM program in the Netherlands with those of offenders who were willing to but did not participate (total N = 86). A quasi-experimental, pre- and postmeasure research design was used to compare these groups. Our findings tentatively suggest that offenders who participate in VOM have more responsibility-taking and victim empathy, feel more guilt and shame, and experience higher moral failure than offenders who do not participate in VOM do. Offenders also reported feeling significantly less awkward about meeting the victim again after VOM. Future research should address how and to what degree these psychological changes translate into a lower risk of reoffending.

Highlights

  • The practice of restorative justice continues to grow (D’Souza and L’Hoiry, 2019)

  • Analyses showed that offenders who participated in victim-offender mediation (VOM) took more responsibility 6–8 weeks after VOM than offenders who did not participate in VOM did

  • This is in accordance with previous qualitative research, which showed that hearing the impact of the offense from the victim during VOM affects the amount of regret and responsibility the offender feels (Choi et al, 2011; Miller and Hefner, 2015)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The practice of (and research into) restorative justice continues to grow (D’Souza and L’Hoiry, 2019). Instead of aiming to punish offenders, restorative justice focuses on what the involved parties need. Facilitating and organizing a constructive dialogue between the parties is important to achieve these goals (Umbreit et al, 2004; Zehr, 2015; Claessen and Roelofs, 2020). This dialogue should give victims and offenders the opportunity to ask questions about the offense, explain the Psychological Impact of VOM consequences of the offense, and come to a mutual agreement about how to repair the damage that has been inflicted

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call